0
Nope! It's a preposition.
1. Prepositional phrases that feature "without" can modify nouns. e.g.
"A lizard without legs is still not technically a snake."
2. Prepositional phrases that feature "without" can be adverbial. e.g.
"Without that evidence, we can't go to trial."
3. When a prepositional phrase introduces a clause, that clause must be a noun phrase, specifically a nominalization or gerund clause. e.g.
"I'd like to go to a party without Harry('s) inviting himself to ride with us."
"Try to tell her the truth without making her angry."
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago"Without" is not usually a conjunction. Without is a preposition (without hope) or more rarely an adverb (to do without, having enemies without and within).
The archaic use was as a conjunction meaning "unless" (They won't leave without we see them. which in modern use becomes They won't leave without us seeing them.)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is whoever a conjunction?
No, "whoever" is a pronoun, not a conjunction. It is used to refer to any person or people without specifying who exactly.
is undoubtedly a conjunction?
No, "undoubtedly" is actually an adverb, used to convey high certainty or confidence in a statement. It is not a conjunction, which are words used to connect clauses or sentences.
Is without a subordinating conjunction?
Sure! A sentence without a subordinating conjunction is typically shorter and more direct in conveying information. This often results in a clearer and more focused statement.
Is it to correct to say in conjunction to or in conjunction with?
In conjunction with
This results when two or more independent clauses are joined by a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
This is known as a comma splice. It is considered a punctuation error as it incorrectly joins two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation. To correct a comma splice, you can either use a semicolon, separate the clauses into two sentences, or add a coordinating conjunction like "and," "but," or "or."
Is about a preposition adverb or conjunction?
"About" can function as a preposition when it is used to indicate a topic or subject. For example, "We're talking about grammar." It can also be an adverb when used to convey approximation, as in "It's about 5 kilometers away."
Is between a conjunction?
No, it is not a conjunction. It is a preposition (used with an object) or an adverb (without an object).
is undoubtedly a conjunction?
No, "undoubtedly" is actually an adverb, used to convey high certainty or confidence in a statement. It is not a conjunction, which are words used to connect clauses or sentences.
Is the word 'without' is noun?
It is a preposition as in 'he went to England without her'. It can be used as an adverb, although archaic, as in 'the enemy without'. As a conjunction as in 'he will not be able to go without our knowing it'
Is it to correct to say in conjunction to or in conjunction with?
In conjunction with
Can you have a preposition without a prepositional phrase?
No, a preposition is always part of a prepositional phrase. The preposition is the word that introduces the phrase and is followed by the object of the preposition.
Is also a verb?
No. Also is an adverb. It means "in addition." It can also (arguably) function as a conjunction without "and."
Is within a conjunction?
"Within" is a preposition, not a conjunction. It is used to show relationships in time or space, indicating that something is inside a certain area or period.
This results when two or more independent clauses are joined by a comma without a coordinating conjunction?
This is known as a comma splice. It is considered a punctuation error as it incorrectly joins two independent clauses without a coordinating conjunction or appropriate punctuation. To correct a comma splice, you can either use a semicolon, separate the clauses into two sentences, or add a coordinating conjunction like "and," "but," or "or."
What word implies that eternity is abundant and without end?
Your question contains your answer.... "Eternity," implies without end. -Forever, or infinity can be used in conjunction with "eternity"
Is without a subordinating conjunction?
Sure! A sentence without a subordinating conjunction is typically shorter and more direct in conveying information. This often results in a clearer and more focused statement.
When is a conjunction false?
A conjunction is false only when all statements connected by "and" are individually true, but when taken together, they form a false statement. For example, the conjunction "It is raining and the sun is shining" would be false because it's impossible for it to rain and for the sun to be shining at the same time.
