Yes it was.
1992 was the first leap year after 1990.
yes, it was a leap year. you can also check your computers calander to find out.
1992
February only has 29 days on a leap year. As 2008 was a leap year, you can work it out from there. 2008-1992 = 16 years. 16 is a multiple of 4 so yes it was a leap year.
Yes. The only leap years of the '90s were 1992 and 1996.
yes in fact the 19th leap year of the 20th century
1992 was a leap year, which means it had 366 days instead of the usual 365 days in a non-leap year. Leap years occur every four years to account for the extra time it takes for the Earth to orbit the sun. Therefore, 1992 had 366 days.
1992, because 1992 is evenly divisible by 4 and not evenly divisible by 100
No, but 2004 and 2008 were both leap years.
Ah, what a happy little question! Yes, 1999 was not a leap year. Leap years occur every four years, except for years that are divisible by 100 but not by 400. So, 1999 didn't have an extra day in February like leap years do. Just a gentle reminder to appreciate each day, whether it's a leap year or not.
From 2000 through 2099:2000200420082012201620202024202820322036204020442048205220562060206420682072207620802084208820922096
Leap Years are years divisible by four, with two exceptions. 1. "Century" year numbers (divisible evenly by 100) are not leap years. 2. Years divisible evenly by 400 ARE leap years. So years like 1992 and 1996 were leap years. Century years like 1900 or 2100 are NOT leap years. But 2000 was a leap year, and 2400 will be.