1992, because 1992 is evenly divisible by 4 and not evenly divisible by 100
1992 was the first leap year after 1990.
yes, it was a leap year. you can also check your computers calander to find out.
no it is not....
1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.1990 was not a leap year, so there was no 29th of February in 1990.
The year 1990 had 365 days. It was not a leap year, as leap years occur every four years, and 1990 is not divisible by 4. Therefore, it followed the standard calendar structure of a non-leap year.
Yes it was.
1992
February only has 29 days on a leap year. As 2008 was a leap year, you can work it out from there. 2008-1992 = 16 years. 16 is a multiple of 4 so yes it was a leap year.
Yes. The only leap years of the '90s were 1992 and 1996.
1991
1990
1990 was not a leap year, as it is not divisible by 4. Therefore, 1990 contained 365 days.