Both of these are NTSC or North America video resolution formats, which is made up of 480 tv horizontal lines. 352 x 240 is CIF or 1CIF. 704 x 240 is 2CIF. CIF stands for Common Interchange Format.
CIF only has 240 lines of horizontal resolution, and is really used when you want to conserve disc space on your recorder, or don't want to record large files due to a hard drive limitation.
The NTSC analog signal has 480 lines, which is made up of 240 evenly spaced lines & 240 odd spaced lines. The aspect ratio is 3x4, which is 3 units high and 4 units wide. And that defines horizontal resolution as the amount of vertical space you can see in 3 out of 4 units, or how much you can measure in 75% of the width of the image.
CIF designed to match the 240 lines of a field, though it only produces 75%, so you are really seeing 264 TV lines. The rest of your image is discarded, even if you use a ultra high resolution 600 tv line camera. Because of this, you are pretty much throwing away 1/2 of your image, so any camera resolution over 264 tv lines won't look any better.
On the other hand, 704 x 240 matches the horizontal scan lines, and the 704 gives us 528 tv lines (704 / 4 x 3), so a 540 line camera will show pretty much all the detail. The reason it does this is because it is the lowest setting you can record, that maintains the full horizontal resolution of the camera, though the vertical resolution is shorter. This is a good step above for better quality recordings, though it will be wide & narrow.
So the answer to your question is no, 352 x 240 is not a better resolution than 704 x 240.
For the best recordings, you want to go with 4CIF, or 704 x 480, which supports the full 480 vertical resolution of NTSC video signals, giving you the best possible images, though consuming much more hard drive space than CIF.
"A 720p resolution would be better than other smaller numbered resolution and is much better than traditional tube televisions. However, a 720p resolution television is not necessarily better or worse than a 1080i. Each is best for different types of viewing."
If you are talking about LCD screen, 1280x800 is good resolution but 1366x768 is even better, you can also look for 1400x1050 which is also better than 1280x800. Remember resolution means the number of pixels (dots) per inch, so the better resolution you have the better images or zooming images you will print without losing quality.
Higher resolution on movies means that the picture will be clearer than on a movie with less resolution. So if you want a really good movie experience, go with the higher resolution.
Generally higher resolution is better but three are instances where increased resolution makes no difference. Text based programs tend to use a far lower resolution than is available. Increasing resolution does not increase readability. Also, using a very high resolution monitor to display low resolution graphics will not make the graphics any better resolution. As high resolution graphics demand a lot of processing power, unnecessary resolution can sometimes take processing power away from other more important tasks. So, while there is no need to obtain the lowest resolution systems, beware of spending more money on a high resolution display if you simply don't need it.
Yes, blue ray is better than DVD because blue ray offers a resolution of 1080ip and DVD only offers a resolution for 480p.
Retina has a better screen resolution and more pixels, display is better on the Retina
The resolution on an HDTV is better than that of a plasma TV, but that is not the only thing to take into account when considering such a large purchase. Here is a website to help with the comparison: http://www.bigscreentvdeals.com.
Free-will is better than the mechanical responses of a clockwork orange .
Yes. The resolution of HD ready is smaller than Full HD. HD ready is not capable of 1080p resolution and Full HD is.
A large matrix with small pixel will give a better resolution.
The resolution of a Blu-Ray disc is about 1080p, which means it fires 1080 pixels over the 480p that a DVD has. This gives Blu-Ray disks a better quality of picture.
The resolution of an optical microscope is not better (or worse) when using natural light. Resolution is determined by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective.Why a vacuum in an electron microscope?The molecules that make up air would scatter the electrons in the electron beam