At this point in history, no.
However, for the majority of the 19th century and the early 20th century, the answer is YES. The US was very much in a territorial expansion phase during that period of time, the very last portion of it acting like an imperial power interested in building an empire.
To acquire land for expansion, whatever the cost.
The US did not acquire it or the land. The US leased the land from the newly established country of Panama, and the US built the canal with Panamanian assistance. Panama does and always has owned the canal.
Many peasants in America became indentured servants as a way to acquire their own land. They agreed to work for a certain number of years in exchange for passage to America, food, shelter, and the promise of land or money once their servitude ended. This system allowed them to eventually attain land ownership, although the conditions were often harsh and exploitative. Ultimately, this practice contributed to the expansion of agriculture and settlement in the colonies.
he land in south america and a whole lot of rivers
To acquire a piece of public land by living on and cultivating it is called claiming the land.
It is not possible because land goes down to the bottom of the ocean.
The English use indebtedness to acquire land by allowing people to farm on the land and pay them profits to pay for everything and if they were unable to pay their land was taken.
They had to fight or kill for new land, kicking out or hurting people that already lived there.
While it is definitely difficult to land a plane without spoilers or putting on the flaps, it is possible. The best scenario for a plane that is trying to land without these important instruments would be to try and obtain as much runway as possible.
pay a guy
no
giving the right to acquire fifty acres of land to the person paying the passage of a laborer to america