0
Big Bang Cosmology is supported by all available evidence, and has been repeatedly tested and shown to conform to observations. All other possibilities have been shown to be counter to evidence, except perhaps the idea that someone is magically manipulating our observations so that they LOOK like a Big Bang.
The question is akin to asking, "Is a helio-centric system real or faked?"
What else can I help you with?
Is the number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy evidence in support of Big Bang Cosmology?
no the no. of stars in the milky way is not the evidence in support of the big bang cosmology.
What type of scientist are associated with the big bang theory?
Scientists who study Big Bang Cosmology are (generally) referred to as cosmologists.
What are the 3 theory's of the earth big bang?
The big bang theory is a model of cosmology it does not have any relation with earth's creation .
What is the big bang theory of earth's creation about?
Big Bang Cosmology deals with the start (not necessary a creation) of our Universe as a whole, not with our Earth.
When did stable atoms form during the big bang?
About 378,000 years after the Big Bang. For more details, check the Wikipedia article on "Recombination (cosmology)".
Who proposed big bang and universe is expanding explain?
The history of the Big Bang theory began with the Big Bang's development from observations and theoretical considerations. Much of the theoretical work in cosmology now involves extensions and refinements to the basic Big Bang model.
Is that a fake nose on bernadette big bang?
Yes
Who is for and against the big bang theory?
All people who believe in the value of observational evidence accept Big Bang Cosmology, just like they accept a heliocentric solar system. In both cases, no other proposal matches what we see, and every significant alternative has been falsified. There are some people who oppose Big Bang Cosmology based solely on their initial presumption of reality: that our entire Universe is significantly younger than 100,000 years. If you START with that presumption, Big Bang Cosmology is, of course, false. The problem is that no observational evidence whatsoever supports that presumption.
How did Stephen hawking prove the big bang theory?
He didn't. Although Hawking has done an immense amount of theoretical work on black holes, as well as the topology of our Universe, he has always taken Big Bang Cosmology as his starting point. That's because, by the time he got his PhD in 1966, observational evidence had pretty much ruled out any cosmology but Big Bang. Hawking has simply improved our mathematical understanding of BBC.
How does the big bang theory serve as an unifying theme in cosmology?
It accounts for the beginnings of both space and time in the universe.
Who were the people associated with the cosmology of the big bang?
Key figures associated with the cosmology of the Big Bang theory include George Lemaitre, a Belgian physicist and Catholic priest who first proposed the theory, and Edwin Hubble, an American astronomer whose observations supported the expanding universe predicted by the Big Bang. Other notable contributors include Alan Guth, Andrei Linde, and Stephen Hawking.
Which theory suggests that for every big bang there is a crunch?
The theory that suggests for every big bang there is a crunch is known as the "Big Crunch" theory. It proposes that the expansion of the universe will eventually stop and reverse, leading to a contraction of the universe back to a singular point, followed by another big bang.
