All people who believe in the value of observational evidence accept Big Bang Cosmology, just like they accept a heliocentric solar system. In both cases, no other proposal matches what we see, and every significant alternative has been falsified.
There are some people who oppose Big Bang Cosmology based solely on their initial presumption of reality: that our entire Universe is significantly younger than 100,000 years. If you START with that presumption, Big Bang Cosmology is, of course, false. The problem is that no observational evidence whatsoever supports that presumption.
Do you have a question about the theory?
Hello i am minakshi answer is that the big bang theory is an example of old scientific theory as big bang theory explains that there was an explosion but the isotropy and the homogenity of the universe is not explained by big bang theory to explain his we connect inflatation theory with big bang theory to explain it so the big bang theory is also an example of old scientific theory.
the big bang theory
The Big Bang Theory is set in Pasadena California.
I don't think the big bang has an opinion about the Bible. Is it against the teachings of the Bible? The Bible says God spoke and the universe leaped into existence. The big bang could be the mechanism for this, or it could not be, it is only a theory.
There is currently no observational data that fundamentally conflicts with the Big Bang model. There are however some people that have trouble accepting the model: they are very much against it.
Big Bang Theory is available for rental only.
The duration of The Big Bang Theory is -1320.0 seconds.
I know of no such reference for a "natural" Big Bang Theory. Must be just another way of referring to the Big Bang Theory with a differing focus (i.e. kind of like the Hot Big Bang Theory).
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.
No. The Big Bang theory came a lot later.
Constellations are components of galaxies and have little to do with the Big Bang Theory.