C++ is conventionally regarded as a compiled language, however there's nothing in the language itself that prevents it from being interpreted.
C++ is a compiled language, not an interpreted language.
C++ is generally a compiled language.
No. Neither C nor C++ are interpreted. Both need to be compiled and linked to produce highly-optimised machine code, which is then executed.
Yes.EasyTreve Plus has both an interpreted and a compiled version available.
Lisp is both compiled and interpreted language.
Assembler, COBOL, PL/I, C/C++ are all translated by running the source code through a compiler. This results in very efficient code that can be executed any number of times. The overhead for the translation is incurred just once, when the source is compiled; thereafter, it need only be loaded and executed. Interpreted languages, in contrast, must be parsed, interpreted, and executed each time the program is run, thereby greatly adding to the cost of running the program. For this reason, interpreted programs are usually less efficient than compiled programs. Some programming languages, such as REXX™ and Java™, can be either interpreted or compiled.
Some C programs can be compiled in C++, yes.
Interpreted.
Compiled.
It is easy to tell: there is no interpreter for C and C++, they are compiled languages.
As far as I know, interpreted software does not run compiled software at all.
Java is considerably more convenient than either C or C++ due to its extremely high level of abstraction. However, that convenience comes at the cost of both performance and efficiency.