Yes, Chinese control over Tibet is a legitimate concern of US foreign policy due to human rights violations, cultural preservation, and geopolitical stability in the region. The U.S. has historically supported Tibetan autonomy and the protection of its unique cultural identity, viewing China's actions as a challenge to international norms regarding self-determination and human rights. Additionally, Tibet's strategic location and resources make it a focal point in U.S.-China relations, influencing broader geopolitical dynamics in Asia.
Boxer Rebellion
The Boxer Rebellion included Chinese attacks on foreign missionaries.
Chinese against foreign trade
Pinghou C. Liu has written: 'Chinese foreign affairs--organization and control' -- subject(s): China, China. Wai chiao pu, Foreign relations
The Ancient Chinese resisted foreign trade and influence. It was not until the Mongols took over the country was trade opened up. Even though China eventually regained control oftheir country, they could no longer keep foreign trade and relations out. A+ is "insisted they adopt Chinese traditions"
The Chinese people were tired of foreign influence.
the cold war
inflation
China's nationalists wanted to make life for every Chinese person decent and enjoyable. They also wanted political and economic rights for all Chinese people and an end to the foreign control of China.
Chinese
The Cold War ended in 1990 and is no longer a current foreign policy concern, with the possible exception of North Korea, which is in some ways carrying on the war.
Erin Quirk has written: 'Essential Chinese' -- subject(s): Textbooks for foreign speakers, English, Grammar, Spoken Chinese, Chinese language 'Intermediate Chinese' -- subject(s): Textbooks for foreign speakers, English, Grammar, Spoken Chinese, Chinese language