Want this question answered?
German interests appeared to clash with U.S. interests. Germany's autocratic government did not please democratic Americans.
East Germany was a communist country with no elections. West Germany was democratic with elections.
The Habsburgs were "overthrown" in1918 along with autocratic dynasties of Russia and Germany.
It was Bonn. Let's be clear on this: Bonn was the capital of the FDR, the Federal Republic of Germany, West Germany. But the DDR, the Deutches Democratik Republik, The German Democratic Republic, East Germany, the capital was Berlin. And no, I am not for one moment suggesting East Germany was democratic, but that was its name......
Many left because of a failure of a democratic revolution in Germany in 1848.
It has a democratic government I think
The Roman Republic was neither authoritarian nor democratic. It was oligarchic.
Oligarchy under AKP government.
oligarcy thx 4 lstening
The answer is democratic
He is an Autocratic leader!
Autocratic: government power high participation low and citizen participation absolute Oligarchic: Government power political power select and general citizen participation rule by a few Democratic: Government ruled by the people like the US Government power citizen participation I'm in gifted social studies
Democratic
India has no official religion, which is why it is considered secular. It is considered a republic since it has a parliament that Indian citizens vote for. Since these votes are free and fair, it is considered a democratic republic (as opposed to an autocratic or oligarchic republic). Note, however, that most countries that have the term "democratic republic" in their name are not democratic republics.
Difference between autocratic and democratic form of leadership
No, because it is a democracy.
Both. In the eye of outside world its democratic but people inside the country are still feeling autocratic govt.