no
Some nuclear weapons can be fitted to missiles. In the case of an ICBM (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) a nuclear weapon can be outfitted so that it can reach distant points on the globe.
bombs, weapons, and missiles all play a part which is a part of technology
It is a nuclear weapon that does not require other means of transport, such as a plane or carrier. But can be launched and "steered" toward a target or automatically find its target. (Note: only a handful of countries hold the funds and technology to manufacture these weapons)
Missiles with nuclear warheads have never been used in war. The only nuclear weapons ever used in war were the 2 used to end WW2 in Japan. These were gravity bombs.
Since its free-fall nuclear weapons arsenal was decomissioned in 1998, the United Kingdom's only means of nuclear weapons delivery is via submarines and SLBMs.
They had nuclear missiles machine guns and cool guns
Any form of weapons such as guns, bombs, missiles, etc....
Only the President of the United States has the authority to authorise the use of nuclear weapons. Governors cannot commit armed troops, let alone nuclear weapons, to combat.
Because the nuclear weapons were missiles that could be deployed to the United States. And they were getting ready to launch them. this is lies
While much of the information is classified, Russia is purported to possess 1,643 first line nuclear warheads capable of being delivered by missiles (525 missiles) The TOTAL Russian stockpile of nuclear weapons is believed to be between 8-10 thousand, including 3,000 that are pending disassembly.
Missiles are used for a wide variety of military purposes. They are known to be used to destroy weapons collections and hideouts. New technology has made missiles amazingly accurate.
I believe it is in turkey and the US was forced to remove them from turkey because they were threatend by Russian nuclear weapons in Cuba