0
What else can I help you with?
What country has made recent news for attempting to build a nuclear bomb?
In recent months both Iran and North Korea have been identified as potential nuclear threats. North Korea has successfully tested several nuclear devices. Iran is still developing the technology.
what country made headlines last week when it again stated that is no interest in making nuclear bombs but is seeking to develop nuclear power for its people?
Iran
Why does Washington criticise Iran for Nuclear power and energy but not Israel who have weapons like their American friends?
Israel has never made threats against Iran, while the Iranian government has made it very clear the destruction of Israel is their ultimate goal.
How were Bantu societies organized?
The villages were made up of extended families and were governed by a chief, council, or elders.
Why are Western nations afraid of Iran possessing nuclear weapons?
The reason Western nations are afraid of Iran possessing nuclear weapons is that the Iranian government has made consistent statements that Israel will vanish from the page of history and supported Islamist paramilitary/terrorist groups like Hezbollah and Hamas which are organized to achieve that end. Additionally, Iran signed the NPT while Israel and Pakistan did not, meaning that Iran has certain treaty obligations and benefits whereas those other states do not.
Is Iran a country or state?
Iran is a country made up of many provinces.
What is the difference between nucear family and extended family?
A nuclear family includes parents, children, and any other relatives that live in the home, such as grandparents. The extended family are other relatives who do not live in the home, and can in some cases include close friends.
Is Iran going to World Cup?
No Iran have not made it in 2010.
Should Iran be allowed to develop a nuclear program?
Not under the current leadership. A: I'll try to present both sides: For: The arguments for Iran developing a nuclear program are that Iran does not acknowledge the US's or Europe's arguments saying they shouldn't, and indicate that they feel they should be allowed to pursue an independent course of scientific study and power generation on their own. For the most part, Iran has stated they do not intend to create nuclear weaponry, but this is not always what they say. When they do discuss the development of a nuclear program, they indicate it's in Iran's best interest to do so, especially as a deterent from Western first strike. Against: The arguments against Iran developing a nuclear program are more numberous. First, Iran is basically a fundamentalist theocracy. While there are two parts of the Government, the religious and the secular or political, the religious has at times subscribed to the belief that Islam requires the destruction not only of the Zionist state, but of all the people in it as well. There have been occassional direct threats against Israel from Iran as well, and I've never seen even a statement that say this is not so. It bears noting that it's unlikely Iran will reach parity with Israel's nuclear arsenal (never admitted by Israel but regarded as a given by most intelligence groups), so the only strategy that would have a serious chance of success would likely invovle an interdictive first strike. Additionally, Iran, having a violent past in regional factional warfare (including Suni vs. Shi'ite), is thought to be a likely candidate to use nuclear arms in any case if they had them. Their strategic placement in a geographical sense could make for an increase in overall tension in the Middle East. It bears noting that Russia, arguably Iran's largest trading partner, made the offer to provide the uranium fuel for their nuclear plant, if Iran would desist from refining their own (this refining is what generates the fissile materials needed for weaponization), and Iran refused this compromise, without much of an explanation. Those opposed to Iran having a nuclear energy program (which at this point includes all the UN Security Council, all of the European Union, the US and Great Britain, among others) are concerned that such a move would provide Iran with Nuclear weapons, and that Iranian politics would make the use of nuclear first strike capability a likelihood. Please note that these comments are intended solely as reportage, and may or may not represent my own personal opinions.
Why is there concern about Iran going nuclear although claimed for peaceful use while there is no concern about Israel although it already has nuclear weapons?
This is true for many reasons. First of all, Israel does not officially have nuclear weapons, although common international consensus is that they do. Secondly, Israel is a close ally of the United States, and any nation will be much quicker to condemn a nation that they fear (such as Iran) more so than a nation they trust. It is also much more accepted in the international community that Israel has nuclear weapons because it is a lone nation in a very hostile environment, and other nations that believe Israel may have nuclear weapons would think twice before attacking it. The United States knows that Israel would not dare using it's own nuclear weapons without the permission from either the US or the international community. On the subject of Iran, the international community has no reason to believe that Iran is pursuing nuclear capabilities for peaceful means. These reasons range from the fact that Iran has rejected to be provided with nuclear energy in exchange for giving up it's nuclear program, to the extreme aggressiveness of its current leader, Ahmadinejad (he has made numerous statements to other countries in which they should prepare for the complete and utter destruction of the United States, and Israel).
Why is it bad if Iran has nuclear weapons?
Answer 1its not nessicarily bad seen as the us and everywhere else has them and its not fair they shouldn't but just imagine if they got angry at anyone..."bang" goes everyoneAnswer 2Many countries are worried that a Nuclear-Armed Iran could spark a massive Middle East War.Israel is afraid of what Iran would do if it had a nuclear weapon since Iran has quite clearly stated that it foresees a future where Israel is wiped off the map (regardless of how many times they say that they never said that they will do the wiping). However, there are numerous other countries bordering or near Iran that feel threatened by that country's attempt to acquire nuclear weapons. Bahrain feels especially threatened since Iran has actually called Bahrain its "fourteenth province" and Iranian military leaders have said that suicide bombers are ready to strike at key sites around the Persian Gulf if necessary. Rulers in the UAE and Saudi Arabia have made an increasing rapprochement with the West to have added security from a possible Iranian assault which could come if Iran feels that it can strike with impunity. Such impunity would come from ostensibly having a nuclear weapon and threatening brinkmanship to whatever country would try to stop its conventional attack. We should not be surprised that from February 2006 to January 2007, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, and the Gulf Countries all started or restarted their own nuclear research programs, which is the same period when Iran began to seriously aim for a nuclear weapon.
Who lived in one igluvigak?
An igluvigak, which is an Inuit dwelling typically made from snow or ice, was traditionally used by families or small groups, often consisting of a nuclear family or extended family members. These structures were designed to provide warmth and shelter in harsh Arctic climates. In some cases, groups of hunters might also gather in an igluvigak during extended hunting trips. Each igluvigak was built to accommodate the number of people who intended to use it for a specific period.
