Want this question answered?
Yes, in some legal systems, a judge can also work as an advocate or attorney in other cases. However, there are often restrictions in place to avoid conflicts of interest or bias when a judge is acting as an advocate.
Judge Joe Brown marry Deborah Herron in December 2001
Alana Mathis is the same girl from miiverse and she lives in massachuttes and goes to the kendey school in somerville she has gmail it's alanamathi32@gmail.com
I was just wondering the same thing! I wish I could answer this!
If a judge is acting in his/her capacity of a judge, he/she does not offer testimony and therefore cannot perjure. However, if the judge is testifying as a citizen before another court, he/she is subject to the same rules of perjury as any other person.
A person with a good heart has faith, hope and most of all love. A person who can control his tongue, a person who is empathetic, a person who helps when they see the need and has the ability to relieve that suffering, a person who refrains from destructive criticism, a person who does not judge others, a person who repays harm with good. A person who remembers that God uses the same measure to judge us and the measure we use to judge others, a person who is quick to forgive.
Generally, one can either be a judge or a prosecutor. No person is going to hold both of these positions at the same time. Even if it were possible, having someone in both positions is a conflict of interest, and a new judge would be appointed.
The same thing as a judge. A person who listens to both sides in a dispute and makes a ruling.
Not during the same case. They are separate and distinct roles.
If you have been before the same judge on different matters can you request a new judge on your new case?
When a case is dismissed by a Judge "Without Prejudice" It means that the person can be brought back to trial for that same crime. Normally double jeopardy (constitutionally a person can not be tried for the same crime twice if a case is dropped and the person declared innocent) would prevent that from being possible, but the judge saying the case is without prejudice it does not violate the persons constitutional rights and the person can be brought up on charges for the same crime if more evidence is found later.
As far as I can judge it is the same.