Yes. Julius Caesar, the dictator of Rome, had many enemies amongst the upper class. They did indeed conspire to kill him in the senate on the Ides of March, Mar 15th 44BC. His was attacked by up to sixty people and died from 23 stab wounds. After his death civil war broke out. So Shakespeare's play is fairly accurate.
HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.
Tragedy
194
aids
Julius Caesar is a much more famous historical figure than Brutus. And, although Brutus is the play's main character, it centres around the murder of Caesar, both the planning of it and the consequences of it. It is not as bizarrely misnamed as The Merchant of Venice, which one imagines ought to be either The Moneylender of Venice or The Heiress of Belmont.
yes it is... it is his most famous tragedy
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, how often does Shakespeare use blank verse
There are 5 acts in Julius Caesar. "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" is a play-specifically, a tragedy-written by Shakespeare, which portrays the conspiracy against Roman dictator Julius Caesar and his ultimate defeat at the Battle of Phillipi.
HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.HBO's Rome, although consisting of excellent acting, was fiction. It was historical garbage and depicted historical facts only when it couldn't be helped. Mr. Shakespeare's tragedy of Julius Caesar, was also fiction, but he worked with and around historical facts in a manner that was plausible, at least for his time.
Rome.
The answer is Tragedy
It's set in Rome. It is based on historical events which happened in Rome.
Because everyone dies
Tragedy
In Julius Caesar, the shopkeepers leave work to celebrate Caesar's victory. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar was written by William Shakespeare.
194
they all die!