Lambert projection is conformal.
Both Robinson and Mercator projection have severe distortion close to the poles. The Robinson projection is neither equal-area nor conformal. The Mercator projection is conformal in that it preserves angles, however, it distorts the size and shape of large objects, as the scale increases from the Equator to the poles, where it becomes infinite.
The Mercator projection is used for world maps, and is most accurate between 30 degrees north and south latitude. The further away you go from there, the more exaggerated it becomes. The equal-area projection is also used for world maps, but only represents the continents in equal area with respect to their size, but not location. The conic projection is used for maps that show polar regions, such as Alaska. Imagine an ice-cream cone turned upside down and placed on top of a ball. The only accurate representation would be only in the circle that cone touches the ball.
projection in geography
A Winkle Tribal map projection is a modified azimuthal map projection. This is one of three projection.
in a polar projection you can the northern hemisphere, a mercador projection where you can see stretched out land.
conformal projection
You have to use a map projection. There are various types, and the most common type is a conformal projection, which preserves the shape of small features. There are various different conformal projections in use.
Both Robinson and Mercator projection have severe distortion close to the poles. The Robinson projection is neither equal-area nor conformal. The Mercator projection is conformal in that it preserves angles, however, it distorts the size and shape of large objects, as the scale increases from the Equator to the poles, where it becomes infinite.
Discounting the Mercator, which cartographers tend to HATE but is ubiquitous anyway... Probably the Lambert Conformal Conic projection, or the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection (used by the US National Atlas).
If you just want geographical features, I recommend GMT. It's free and will generate almost literally any projection you can think of.
The Lambert conic conformal qualifies as such. Distortion on higher latitudes is diminished and you can appreciate how big the country actually is.
Charles Henry Deetz has written: 'Lambert projection tables with conversion tables' -- subject(s): Map projection 'Cartography' -- subject(s): Cartography 'The Lambert conformal conic projection with two standard parallels including a comparison of the Lambert projection with the Bonne and Polyconic projections' -- subject(s): Map projection
Oscar S. Adams has written: 'General theory of the Lambert conformal conic projection' -- subject(s): Map projection 'Manual of plane-coordinate computation' 'Elliptic functions applied to conformal world maps' -- subject(s): Map-projection, Elliptic functions 'Application of the theory of least squares to the adjustment of triangulation' -- subject(s): Triangulation, Least squares 'General theory of equivalent projections' -- subject(s): Map projection 'Plane-coordinate systems' -- subject(s): Triangulation, Coordinates, Surveying
I don't think "conformal" is the correct word.
Philippe Lamberts was born in 1963.
The population of Lamberts Bay is 3,600.
Lambert Conic Conformal projection was created in the 18th century By Johann Lambert .This is just one of severl created.These are commonly used throughout the untied states along with other countrys.They are very usefull in creating maps.