No. Los Angeles has a population of 15.25 million, while Mexico as a whole country has a population of 113 million. Mexico City, the capital of Mexico has a population of 21.16 million and is regarded as the third largest city in the world.
Mexico has a population of 112,468,855 (July 2010 est.) while Turkey has one of 77,804,122. Mexico is clearly more populated than Turkey.
Georgia is definitely more populated! Florida is more populated than Georgia.
Yes, Gujjars is more populated than Jats in India.
New York: 8 336 697 persons Los Angeles: 3 792 621 persons
Ethiopia is more populated than Somalia
yes lahore is most populated
Mexico city is bigger by population but los angeles is bigger by area
They are located in many parts of the us, with some states more populated than others. Oklahoma, Arizona, Wisconsin are heavily populated with reservations. Washington, California, New Mexico also have some. Reservations tend to be located in isolated areas, some are more self-sufficient than others.
Zero.
There are a few reasons why China might more populated in the East than the West. The ocean is to the east for example.
No ethiopia is not over populated. Many countries are more populated than Ethiopia.
No. Size of population doesn't correlate with level of development. For example, India is a country with almost 11 times the size of Mexico's population, and it is in much worse shape - i.e.: less development - than Mexico. On the other hand, Japan which is the third largest economy in the world, is a bit more populated than Mexico but has one of the highest living standards in the world.