In terms of evolution, logical. It makes you want children, it makes you want to protect them, and it makes you provide for them unconditionally. This spreads your genes to the next generation and keeps them alive!
Hope this helps.
Yes, it is perfectly logical to do so, especially where considering the boundaries of logic itself, where that logic is applied in ways contrary to normal logic forms, or where suing logic to prove that the illogical truly is illogical (for example, proving that an assumption is incorrect as it would lead to a contradiction, the basis of RAA, means logically considering the illogical).
bitvch
Rabbits are mammals and all rabbits have whiskers, so all mammals have whiskers.
You will have to make a logical inference for the premises, and a logical deduction for the conclusion.
Statistics
Saying the "logical illogical" is equivalent to saying "logical magick". "Magick" is that which the logical mind considers impossible. "Logical" and "illogical" are both "polar opposites", and just two of the many ways of being, one of which is "logical illogical": order WITH chaos, and chaos WITH order. There is great beauty in mathematics based on imaginary numbers (logical illogical).
the processes that are not logical are called illogical processes
The exact opposite of logical is illogical.
Saying the "logical illogical" is equivalent to saying "logical magick". "Magick" is that which the logical mind considers impossible. "Logical" and "illogical" are both "polar opposites", and just two of the many ways of being, one of which is "logical illogical": order WITH chaos, and chaos WITH order. There is great beauty in mathematics based on imaginary numbers (logical illogical).
illogical
illogical. nonrational. intuitive.
the logic in being illogical is the logic that the illogicality can be logically answered by any logical person with logic on illogical logic.
illogical, irrational, unreasonable, unlikely
illegible illegitimate illiterate illogical These all mean not. (Not logical = illogical)
yes, but not if it is illogical.
Yes, it is perfectly logical to do so, especially where considering the boundaries of logic itself, where that logic is applied in ways contrary to normal logic forms, or where suing logic to prove that the illogical truly is illogical (for example, proving that an assumption is incorrect as it would lead to a contradiction, the basis of RAA, means logically considering the illogical).
Illogical is from the Greek word logos (reason or thinking). The prefix il- signifies "without"