Magdalene was Marys last name.
"Magdalene" in Aramaic means "elegant", "great" or "magnificent"; in Hebrew it means "tower". It is the last name of Mary Magdalene from the Bible, but not her surname as we have one today. Place names and family names (Mary bat-Nathanial, aka Mary, the daughter of Nathanial) were used to identify individuals in her era. So she was Mary Magdalene, or Mary of (the area of) Magdala. Magdalene, in the Biblical terminology, refers to the region of Magdala. The name appears to have made its way into common usage as a female name, but essentially it still means "from the region of Magdala".
He wanted it to be Mary Magdalene.
No that is not Mary magadelene, it is John. As John was the youngest of the twelve disciples.
"The Temptation of the Magdalene" refers to the artistic theme depicting Mary Magdalene's struggle with sin and temptation. This subject is often portrayed in religious art, symbolizing themes of redemption, faith, and the battle between earthly desires and spiritual purity.
In those days they did not have any last names like today.In that time period, in that culture, there weren't last names. People were designated by who their parents were, or where they lived.
No, there is no familial relationship between them.Commonly referred to as Mary Magdalene (Marian, Mariam, Marianne or Mariham is more correct) with the area she is suppose to have come from 'Magdala or Magdalene, is simply one of the women disciples of Jesus who helped support this new movement:Luke 8:2-3New International Version (NIV)2 and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; 3 Joanna the wife of Chuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.
No one had last names as we know them in those days. Occasionally people were known by two or more first names - as examples John/Mark (who wrote Marks gospel), Peter/Simon, Paul/Saul, and even Jesus/Emmanuel. If there were two or more people in an area who had the same name, to differentiate between them, a characteristic, or ancestor, or district from where they came was used. As an example, James, the brother of John and James son of Alphaeus were both disciples, as were Simon (also called Peter) and Simon the Zealot, and Judas and Judas Iscariot (Judas from Iscaria) - the one who betrayed Jesus. In the case of Mary Magdalene, there are several Marys in the stories of Jesus. There is Mary the mother of Jesus, Mary of Bethany (who was the sister of Martha and brother of Lazarus), and Mary Magdalene. 'Magdalene' simply means 'from Magdala' a village near Jerusalem, and hence she could be called 'Mary of Magdala' which means the same thing. Therefore 'Magdalene' is not a 'surname' but a description of Mary to differentiate her from the others in the stories of Jesus. There are about 6 different 'Mary's' mentioned in the Gospels -it was a popular name - so nicknames were used to differentiate them.
There is nothing in scripture that would indicate there were other persons present at the Last Supper besides Our Lord and the 12 apostles.
No, all the Gospel accounts tell us that Jesus sat down with the twelve disciples. There is no evidence to suggest that any one else was present.
Mary never attended the Last Supper, but was included in the film to create interest and investigation as to whether she was in fact there. The Last Supper was to be attended by those Apostles who were to hold the Holy Priesthod. No woman alive or dead has ever held the Holy Priesthood.
The rumor is false and no disciple was left out. Studies have shown that the individual whom people claim to be Mary Magdalene is, in fact, the apostle John. I agree that it is probably not Mary Magdalene in the painting, however theoretically since it is John who is claimed to actually be Mary Magdalene that would logically mean that John is not in the painting. However, there is a consensus opinion among experts that John is appears to be very feminine in the painting because Leonardo DaVinci had a tendency to paint very feminine looking young males because of his personal preference for them. No there actually was a disciple left out. His name was Judas, and that was the disciple who betrayed Jesus. I think he was at part of the last supper though. Try looking it up in a non-king James version.
1988