No NASA is not because its healthy
No NASA is not because its healthy
because they suck and waste government money.
It is subjective to label NASA's spending as "waste." NASA's budget is allocated to various programs and missions that help advance scientific research, technology development, and exploration of space. While NASA faces budget overruns and delays like many large organizations, the agency strives to make efficient use of its funding to achieve its goals.
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
Supposedly not as it is said to be a waste as money as we are not guaranteed to find anything and we have better things to spend money on, especially during a credit crunch.
Yes.
NASA's budget comes from taxpayer funds allocated by the US government. As a government agency, NASA does not earn money in the traditional sense, but rather receives funding to support its research, projects, and missions.
Like any large organisation dealing with large amounts of money, the European Union does waste some money, but it does not waste all of its money and itself is not a waste of money.
Waste of money get an LGKS360
they are a waste of money because they get lame when your older the only toy that isn't a waste of money is a tech deck or flick trick
Why carnival is a waste of time and money
NASA pays for it