Yes.
buttcheek
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
No NASA is not because its healthy
No NASA is not because its healthy
NASA's budget comes from taxpayer funds allocated by the US government. As a government agency, NASA does not earn money in the traditional sense, but rather receives funding to support its research, projects, and missions.
NASA's proposed 2013 budget was $17.7 billion for the Fiscal Year.
NASA pays for it
Basically nothing now that Obama is beginning to end NASA.
No NASA is not finished , the government just does not want to support it anymore if you really want NASA to continue you would donate money to NASA because it now only runs on public donations.
1000000000
No cause it s not worth the time
The money that NASA receives goes towards various expenses such as research and development of space missions, spacecrafts, technology, and scientific research, as well as operational costs of running the agency, paying salaries, and maintaining facilities. NASA also allocates funds for partnerships with other organizations, education and outreach programs, and supporting commercial space initiatives.