buttcheek
Yes. If NASA had been permitted to patent the tech it created, they would not have to spend one dime of taxpayer money. The spinoff of NASA is tremendous. You are reading these words on a descendant of NASA's DSKY computer, powered by a descendant of NASA's Integrated Circuit CPU, the first computer on a chip. If you aren't a waste of money, then neither is NASA!
No NASA is not because its healthy
No NASA is not because its healthy
Nasa earns a lot of money trillons on billons of dollars
The vast majority of NASA's money is spent on salaries for NASA employees, and to purchase the hardware for the rockets and satellites that they launch.
too much :'(
NASA is a government agency, therefore funded by government tax, etc
NASA's proposed 2013 budget was $17.7 billion for the Fiscal Year.
.99 to $3.00
It doesn't jackass
NASA pays for it