yes they deserve it after what odysseus has gone through
yes they deserve it after what odysseus has gone through
No Odysseus could have let the suitors leave and tell them to leave the island but his rage and anger got in the way and he killed them all
Yes if Polyphemus is considered a villain then his actions are justified.
No, it was poiseidon
Polyphemos is not a villan to him, but once he started eating Odysseus' men, he became a villan. Not so much a villan, but more of an enemy. His actions are not justified because Odysseus did not have a tender heart to forgive him or even strike a deal about eating his men. He just blinded/totured him which was wrong.
yes they deserve it after what odysseus has gone through
No Odysseus could have let the suitors leave and tell them to leave the island but his rage and anger got in the way and he killed them all
because Odysseus blinded him
Yes if Polyphemus is considered a villain then his actions are justified.
Odysseus blinded his son
because he wants to get the Cyclops out of his way
Odysseus shoots a bow at Antinous... and it killed him
Some may argue that Montresor's revenge in Edgar Allan Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" is justified due to the perceived insult he received from Fortunato. However, others may see his actions as extreme and disproportionate to the offense. Ultimately, whether his revenge is justified is subjective and open to individual interpretation.
I do not know that the cyclops did anything as revenge, but in the book the Odyssey ,it explains that the Cyclops' father , the god Poseidon, is angry at Odysseus and will not let Odysseus return to his country, whereas the other gods take pity on him.
Odysseus broods and plots his revenge, retreating to the corner to eat.
Odysseus begins plotting his revenge once he learns of the suitors, but he does not start killing them until Book XXII, after threading his bow, and shooting it through the twelve axes' handles.
No, it was poiseidon