Orion is not a constellation included in the zodiac. The Sun does not pass through this sign and it is not on the ecliptic. Orion was a great hunter in Greek mythology.
Orion is a constellation - not a star sign. "Signs" are the constellations along the ecliptic, or better known as the zodiac.
No, it is not a zodiac sign. Zodiac signs are those that encircle the ecliptic, the apparent path of the Sun and stars in the sky.
There's no answer to this question, because the definition of circumpolar depends on where you are. If you're at the pole, all the constellations you can see are circumpolar. If you're on the equator, there are no circumpolar constellations.
Completely depends on where in the World you are. If off to one side of Orion - probably Sirius. If on the ecliptic (line of the sun through the zodiac) probably Venus
No. The Zodiac are 12 constellations that lie in the plane of the ecliptic; circumpolar ("moving around the pole") stars are well above or below the ecliptic.
No, circumpolar constellations are close to the pole and never "set".Libra is close to the equator and is also on the ecliptic, the apparent path of the sun.
Orion is not a constellation included in the zodiac. The Sun does not pass through this sign and it is not on the ecliptic. Orion was a great hunter in Greek mythology.
Orion is a constellation - not a star sign. "Signs" are the constellations along the ecliptic, or better known as the zodiac.
No. All circumpolar constellations are found near the celestial poles. Because of their proximity to the poles, they never disappear from view. Sagittarius is on the ecliptic and thus (like all other zodiac constellations) not close enough to the poles to render it circumpolar.
No they do not. By definition circumpolar stars do not "rise". They are above the observer's horizon at all times.
No - the moon travels along the same path that the sun and planets travel - the ecliptic. Orion's belt is too far below the ecliptic.
No, it is not a zodiac sign. Zodiac signs are those that encircle the ecliptic, the apparent path of the Sun and stars in the sky.
Circumpolar, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. Technically, a circumpolar constellation is one that never sets, but just goes around the elevated pole. That's the north star Polaris in the northern hemisphere, or the blank spot of space above the south pole. This, however, depends on your latitude; the higher your latitude, the more constellations are "circumpolar" for you. I live near Sacramento, CA, USA, at latitude about 38 degrees north, so any constellation within 38 degrees of Polaris is "circumpolar" for me. That includes constellations such as Ursa Major, Cassiopeia, and Draco, but not constellations like Orion.
No. All circumpolar constellations are found near the celestial poles. Because of their proximity to the poles, they never disappear from view. Sagittarius is on the ecliptic and thus (like all other zodiac constellations) not close enough to the poles to render it circumpolar.
No there are no circumpolar constellations on the equator.
There's no answer to this question, because the definition of circumpolar depends on where you are. If you're at the pole, all the constellations you can see are circumpolar. If you're on the equator, there are no circumpolar constellations.