0
Is Poe's narrator an example of a reliable or an unreliable narrator Give evidence from the story to prove your point?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Poe's narrator in "The Tell-Tale Heart" is an unreliable narrator. He claims to be completely sane but his erratic behavior and obsession with the old man's eye suggest otherwise. His irrational decision to murder the old man because of his eye color and his eventual confession due to imaginary noises demonstrate his lack of credibility.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What do you call a first-person narrator who is not always trustworthy?
Unreliable narrator. The usual example of this is 'The Cask of Amontillado' by Edgar Alan Poe, wherein the narrator Montresor is progressively seen as been mad rather than credible.
Which one the following people is an example of an unreliable narrator?
Unreliable narrator means the plot device that the narrator of the story is not sincere, or introduces a bias in his/her narration and possibly misleads the reader, hiding or minimizing events, characters, or motivations.
Is Edgar Allan Poe an unreliable narrator in the poem 'The Raven'?
Yes, Edgar Allan Poe is considered an unreliable narrator in the poem "The Raven" because his grief and mental anguish distort his perception of reality, leading him to hallucinate and misinterpret the presence of the bird as a supernatural entity. This unreliable perspective is a deliberate device used by Poe to enhance the eerie and unsettling atmosphere of the poem.
The first person narrartor recounts the view if and may be unreliable?
Yes, the first person narrator may be unreliable and appear to "lie" to the reader, or at least contradict him.herself. An example is the narrator in Nabokov's Pale Fire; he insists the central 999-line poem is about him, while it becomes obvious to the reader that it is not.
What's the best example of a unreliable narrator?
What I did on apex is "Guilty criminal." 🌚 and I got it right
Which of these is the best reason why an author would use an unreliable narrator?
to make a story more interesting (apex)
Is the narrator in The Tell-Tale Heart reliable or unreliable?
The narrator in "The Tell-Tale Heart" is considered unreliable due to their erratic behavior, paranoia, and obsession with the old man's eye. Their distorted perspective and actions raise doubts about the accuracy of events as they unfold in the story.
Why does seeing the events in these lines from the narrators point of view limit your understanding of what actually happening support your answer with explicit textual evidence?
Seeing events from the narrator's point of view limits understanding because the narrator's perspective could be biased or unreliable. For example, the narrator's emotions, experiences, or beliefs might color their interpretation of events, leading to a skewed portrayal. This can be seen in the text when the narrator's personal opinions intrude on the description of events, clouding the reader's perception of the truth.
Give specific examples of the intrusive narrator in Jane Eyre and is the narrator reliable and what effect does this intrusiveness have on your relationship to the narrator?
An example of the intrusive narrator in Jane Eyre is when the narrator interrupts the story to directly address the reader, such as in the opening lines of the novel. The narrator can be considered reliable as their perspective on events is consistent throughout the story. The intrusiveness of the narrator creates a more intimate relationship with the reader, as if the narrator is sharing their thoughts and feelings directly with us.
What do you call the person who tells the story when he is omniscient or all knowing and reliable?
A narrator who is omniscient, all-knowing, and reliable is often referred to as a reliable third-person omniscient narrator. This type of narrator has insight into the thoughts and feelings of all characters in the story and can provide a comprehensive and trustworthy account of events.
What is the advantages of having written records of the past?
it is full of reliable historical facts but there are disadvantages aswell for example the dates may be false, it could be a biased piece or it may be unreliable
Why is first-hand evidence more reliable than second-hand evidence?
First-hand evidence is evidence that comes from someone that witnessed/was apart of whatever the situation is. For example, if there was a fire in a building, and you were trying to figure out what caused it, you would interview those who were in the building around the time of the fire. That would be first-hand evidence. Second-hand evidence would be people who were outside at the time of the fire, or people who were not directly witnessing the event. It is more reliable because the people were right there, and have a personal account of what happened.
