answersLogoWhite

0

Is Putin OK with Obama leading from behind in Syria?

Updated: 8/21/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

Putin would actually prefer less US involvement or more coordinated US involvement as Russia implements its own foreign policy will in Syria. Currently, the US and Russia have different priorities, with the US wanting to support the Free Syrian Army and Russia wanting to support Assad. Both can agree to oppose Islamic State and Putin would likely prefer cooperation on those grounds, if only to avoid friendly fire.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Yes. President Putin sees President Obama as the junior partner and see the Russian-US relationship in Syria similar to the relationship in space.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is Putin OK with Obama leading from behind in Syria?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Will President Obama honor Putin's order to evacuate Syria?

NO. Putin gave no such order and Obama has actually increased US presence in Syria over the llast year. The exact opposite has happened, with Putin primarily withdrawing from Syria.


Was it wise for President Obama to order Putin to send troops to Syria?

Obama never ordered Putin to send troops to Syria, so this is non-issue. However, if he did so, it would be unwise since Putin would buttress the Assad Regime against the US interest in supporting the Free Syrian Army.


Can Vladimir Putin save Obama in the budget crisis like he did with Syria?

Vladimir Putin certainly could save Obama again as he did in Syria and Iran but remember he has his own country to run. He does not have time to save Obama everytime he stumbles or bumbles. Putin stopped the Obama's madness in the attempted attack on the Syrians to prevent a third World War. Obama's distruction of the USA economy likely will not hurt anyone outside the U.S. and would not show up on Putin's crisis radar screen. Until Obama threatens other countries Putin will not get involved. Also don't expect Russia to bail the USA out.


Did Presidents Putin and Obama create the Ukraine Crisis to get distract people from the Obamacare disaster?

In a word yes. Both presidents are Progressives and they seem to have a great affinity for one another. President Putin, as the senior partner have been mentoring and protecting Obama since Obama was elected. Last year Putin saved Obama from his ill-advised "Red Line" policy in Syria. President Obama's single minded focus has been promoting the Affordable Care Act. Putin has been helping Obama on the international stage by moving into geographical areas that Obama wants to abandon. Also Putin offered Edward Snowden sanctuary which gave Obama an out on that crisis. Recently the Right Wing in U.S. (no friend to Obama or Putin) have been attacking the Affordable Care Act. Putin stage a fake crisis in Crimea to distract these mutual enemies. This will give president Obama the opportunity to complete the deployment of Obama care. If necessary President Obama will give Putin all of Ukraine.The only short term casualty is Secretary of State Kerry's Global Warming initiative.


Will President Obama stand firm with Vladimir Putin on maintaining Ukraine in the Russian Sphere of Influence?

Yes. President Obama made clear to then President Medvedev (now Prime Minister) that he could work more closely with the Russians after Obama won re-election. President Obama has been true to his word and has been a close ally with President Putin in Syria, Iran, Egypt, Venezuela, Cuba, and Ukraine. President Obama would also like to work with Putin on eliminating U.S. nuclear weapons but the Republicans will likely block this initiative.


Can Obama claim Mission Accomplished in Syria?

No, because the mission is ongoing. Vladimir Putin was able to get his allies in Syria to agree with a UN proposal to allow inspections and to turn over chemical weapons. The same plan was also proposed by several diplomats, including John Kerry, but fortunately, Putin was able to move it forward, having previously stopped any efforts to punish Syria. It is still unclear whether Syria will in fact turn over all of their chemical weapons, and President Obama has said the US reserves the right to take future action if they do not.


Will Barack Obama attack Syria?

I think he would not because. Syria already handed over their chemical weapons. But Obama no matter what wants to attack.


Should president Obama win a second nobel prize for his handling of the crimea crisis?

Possibly. It would make more sense to split it between President Vladimir Putin, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and President Barack Obama for Crimea, Syria, Iran and Egypt.


Should Vladimir Putin win a Nobel Peace Prize for Syria?

That is unlikely. Given that Russia blocked every effort to forge a diplomatic solution and defended (and supported) Syria's autocratic government until recently, it would be hard to make the case that Mr. Putin is a peacemaker. But if your question is really about why President Obama won the peace prize in 2009, he was among the many who expressed surprise; he did not think he deserved such an award, and he said so. The judges disagreed: at that time, they saw his belief in diplomacy as a welcome shift from the Bush era policy of bellicose rhetoric and attacks on countries like Iraq. Rightly or wrongly, President Obama has not changed his belief in diplomacy, whatever you may think of his views on foreign policy. It remains to be seen whether the sudden interest Mr. Putin has shown in diplomacy will be long-lasting or just temporary. If he does turn out to have a serious interest in solving problems in the middle east by using diplomacy, perhaps he actually will get nominated for a peace prize at some point.


Why does Obama want to Chemical bomb Syria and blame it on President Assad?

There is no evidence that President Obama has authorized any chemical bombs. There are many rumors and myths online, and this assertion is one of them. It is false.


Would it make sense to have Vladimir Putin resolve the Obama's disaster in Benghazi?

First, this question makes the assumption that what happened in Benghazi was "Obama's disaster." While that is a popular talking point on right-wing radio and TV, the situation is a lot more complicated than that, and there is plenty of blame to go around, including blame for congress, which cut the security budget of a number of the embassies, including Benghazi. Had Ambassador Stevens received better protection (he was relying on local militias, sad to say), he might still be alive. That said, Mr. Putin has shown no evidence of being a diplomat. He wanted to protect his ally, Mr. Assad of Syria, and he finally decided the best way to do that was to broker a deal about the chemical weapons. His aim was to make the world see Russia as a "player" in international diplomacy. But unfortunately, Russia had previously vetoed every effort by the world community to get Syria to stop killing civilians or stop using chemical weapons. Thus, given Mr. Putin's record of refusing to allow diplomacy before, there is no reason to believe he would want to do anything helpful about Benghazi.


Is it true Obama had a gun running scheme in Syria?

No, this is a complete falsehood, probably spread by the president's political enemies. There is no evidence to support it.