Assuming that you are referring to the third installment of the Urban Legends movie series, Urban Legends: Bloody Mary (2005), The Grudge is about 1000 times scarier than this movie. Urban Legends: Bloody Mary is definitely one of the worst Horror movies ever made.
It's sort of hard to compare the two, because they're scary in completely different ways. The Exorcist is a supernatural horror movie, while Saw is blood-and-guts torture horror.But if I had to choose, I'd probably say the Exorcist. Spooky and creepy always wins over bloody and gory, for me.
No. Not at all.
I would say that the Blair Witch Project is far scarier than Paranormal Activity because Paranormal is very lame and has no suspense and thrills.
Umm , well .. Yes New Moon is scarier than twilight, the first movie. Because Edward practically almost dies from getting smashed to death. : ( And Victoria is a bit scary in this one. + there is werewolves in this movie : )
AnswerThe Grudge 3 is scarier than 1 and 2.AnswerJu-On and The Grudge are both very scary, in my opinion. But the sequels are absolutely awful; don't bother with anything except the first Grudge, and the original Japanese version, Ju-On. No one who is old enough to appreciate the difference between a good movie and a bad one would EVER say that the Grudge sequels are better than the original ones.AnswerNo the grudge is not scary at all i mean all it did was make me jump
It's sort of hard to compare the two, because they're scary in completely different ways. The Exorcist is a supernatural horror movie, while Saw is blood-and-guts torture horror.But if I had to choose, I'd probably say the Exorcist. Spooky and creepy always wins over bloody and gory, for me.
Most people say Bloody Mary is just a myth, but if she is real than probably.
yes. that movie was scarier than watching a vampire one
elizabeth is more popular than mary1
no dark water isn't scarier than prom night
In my opinion, the original The Grudge is much scarier than any of the Saw movies. However, the sequels to The Grudge are awful; the Saw movies are definitely better than The Grudge sequels.Depends on what scares you. "The Grudge" is much more about ghosts, mysteries, and the paranormal. Whether they accomplish this in a really scary way depends a lot on the viewer. But, comparatively, it is less gory."Saw" is a snuff film (no offense) where the horror comes primarily through the violent psychological, and ultimately physical, slow and gruesome destruction of a bunch of people who find they are connected in one way or another. It is, in a word, disturbing. This kind of thrill/fear has a significant following, which is why the franchise has continued to an almost ridiculous extreme.Personally, I have trouble watching the extreme gore of a movie like "Saw", but some people really think it's scary.If you're looking for a spooky rental, I suggest a dark night, dim lighting, maybe a fire in the fireplace, and watch "The Strangers." Believe it or not, this film is much scarier when watched at home rather than a theater. In my opinion it was treated somewhat unfairly by critics. The story relates more with regular moviegoers than does "The Grudge", while providing plenty of the psychological horror found in a "Saw" movie.
Mary doesn't deserve her nick name because Henry VIII, her father killed far more people than Mary I did.
it depends what you mean. bloody Mary tried to restore Catholicism to England, and burnt Protestants to try and get her way. Elizabeth wanted to restore protestantism, and in some respects succeeded. if you were Protestant Elizabeth was a better queen, but if you are catholic Mary was a better queen. hope that helps! PS: bloody Mary wasn't actually that bloody!
Queen Elizabeth was older than Mary Queen of Scots who was the daughter of her cousin. Elizabeth was born 1533 and Mary 1542. Elizabeth also had a half-sister Mary (Bloody Mary).
The carrot is a fierce predator that eats its prey whole. It scares the heebie jeebies out of three-year-olds. Yes, I am scarier than a carrot, fear me!
yes
No. Not at all.