First you observe, then you "inference".
If no observation is made you can not make an inference.
You observe both the movie and the language but in order to tell good from bad you "inference".
When you claim the movie is good and/or claim the language could be better, then you have applied some sort of thoughts to your observations and that is an Inference.
Short answer. It should be considered an inference.
It would commonly be considered an observation, but I beg to differ :-)
Regards.
One would use scientific observations in order to make an inference, which is a logical deduction of what will occur based on what one has observed. For instance, if one observed a person putting food into an oven, one could infer that the food will be heated.
In the English language there is no plural for how and why. Their number is inferred by the way they are used. For example, if the question could have many answers or reasons, the inference would be plural, but if the question could only have one answer or one reason, the inference would be singular.
(*an inference is something intended, or suspected to be intended, while not directly said) The sheriff said that someone was being questioned, with the inference that the man was a suspect in the case. The inference of the Senator's vote was that he did not support the President. By inference, anyone going to Mecca could be considered a pilgrim.
She arrived home with wet hair, so I made the inference that she had just taken a shower.
It appears there is no excerpt provided for reference. Could you please provide the excerpt so I can help you identify an inference that can be made from it?
you can learn alot
It can. Basically, inference is looking at the evidence and coming to some conclusion as to what something is likely to be. That sentence has many vague words in it so here are some examples that might help: Logical inference: Dogs are mammals. Rover is a dog. Inference: Rover is a mammal. Mathematical inference works in the same way but the statements are mathematical. Statistical inference is also similar but the results refer to statements of likelihood rather than certainty. So, if I analysed the lengths of all of Shakespeare's plays, I could calculate the average length of a Shakesperian play and tell you that I expect a play of his to be around so many pages (or words). Or I could find out the maximum and my inference could be that the play is sure to be less than or equal to that number.
Direct observation is an observation in which you have complete view and capability to observe and experiment with an object- hope i could help
When you are inferring, you are making an inference. If you see a little girl whose nose is red, she has watery eyes, and has a pile of tissues next to her, you are going to infer that she is sick. This is different than an observation. The observation would be that her nose is red, there is a pile of tissues, etc. Inferring is taking the observations and coming up with an explanation that makes sense to you.
For an ending, the word could be "summation". For a logical determination, the word could be "deduction" or "inference".
The fact that many of the Pilgrims could read and write is evidence of their education. Additionally, their ability to create legal documents, such as the Mayflower Compact, further supports the inference that they were educated individuals.
"Deci" is not a standalone language. It could be a misspelling or abbreviation for something else. Can you provide more context or details for me to better assist you?