No. Tibet is an indivisible part of china, china is a powerful country, so Tibet is powerful too. We can not compare them separately, because they are combined together as a whole, they are the same, there's no difference between them.
China is more powerful than Mali.
Realistically, China will never grant independence to Tibet. Bear in mind that there are already more Chinese people in Tibet than there are Tibetans. So even by a purely democratic vote of its current residents, Tibet would not now vote to secede from China.
China. The Qinghai-Tibet railway, which connects Lhasa (the capital of Tibet) with the rest of China, reaches a maximum altitude of 5072 metres above sea level. More than 960 km is at an elevation of more than 4,000 metres.
Tibet Borders with China in the East, India through West to South, Nepal, Bhutan and Myanmar in South and Turkestan in north-west. Tibet is a landlocked country which was autonomous until 1950 when People's republic of China forcibly occupied Tibet and more than 1 million Tibetans died resisting against the heavy Chinese force. Tibet remains an occupied state under the People Republic of China yet the Exiled Tibetan government is situated outside of Tibet in India demanding for autonomy for Tibetans under the constitution of PRC.
All the countries other than India, Nepal, China,Bhutan, Myanmar, Mongol and Turkestan does not border with Tibet.
was Japan less powerful than china in 1900
92.8% of people in Tibet are ethnically Tibetan.
China is definitely much richer than India. The Indian Government is to be blamed for such poor economic status of India. Corruption is more in India than China.
Mongolia, Tibet and the Himalayan regions of South East Asia
Please be careful, you may confuse Tibet with Tibetan Plateau, they are two different concepts. Tibetan Plateau encompass a fraction of India's territory. Despite some unsolved problems with the boundary of the two countries, Tibet has nothing to do with India. Tibet is a part of China.
Yes. In reality, the current Chinese government suppresses a bunch of evidence that Tibet used to be an empire. It was an Empire for more than 10 centuries until the 1950's or 1900's (no one is sure because China says it always ruled Tibet, then said 1900, but Tibet says 1950's) when the Chinese forces conquered Tibet even though Tibet signed a treaty once with Mongolia stating it was its own country before. Found all of this from Wikipedia, a lot of other documents around the web supports Tibet to used to be a country. The sad part is, my Dad is Chinese, and even he thinks that Tibet was never a country and thought Chinese ruled it all the time. Must've been the government that taught him that, because he was born in China. China sometimes goes overboard with lies and such, and I'm saying this even though I Chinese!!!!!
A bomb is more powerful than a bullet its obvious