Want this question answered?
I believe that it is very likely that they are related. My great grandmother was a Wallace. Thinking back in time, at the time of William Wallace, the clan didn't seem to be very large, so why wouldn't we American Wallace's be related, somehow? Thanks!
Its because he was legendary.
William Wallace's father was called Alan Wallace and he died because he went out to fight the English and the the English killed him and William was back at the camp when all of this was happening and when William found out he was so depressed and the he worked for the English and the he betrayed him for what they done to his family and then that is why William Wallace is so famous for fighting the English hand for his revolting death.
Conviction of cause.
Mary queen of scot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ William Wallace died in 1305 and Queen Mary was born in 1542 so the above answer is clearly not correct. There is no proof that Wallace was married, the dramatisation of his marriage in Braveheart uses poetic license.
The tactics employed by Wallace were similar to what you could call 'Terrorist Tactics' today. The main reason was that Wallace, being only a minor knight, was unable to call many men to his banner, so guerrilla tactics were employed to carry out successful opposition.
Sir William Wallace was hanged, drawn and quartered by the English at Smithfield in London. His remains were taken to Newcastle, Berwick, Aberdeen and Stirling, so there was no grave.In the 1950s some Scots built a small monument to Wallace which is at Smithfield on the back wall of St. Bart's hospital. This is the closest thing to a grave.See the link below for pictures.
William Wallace led a war for independence from England. The English will tell you they did not murder Wallace, rather they executed him for treason and atrocities against civilians during war.
No. Braveheart, whilst being an exciting film, was full of historical inaccuracies. Isabella's firstborn, Edward III was born on 13 November 1312, William Wallace was executed on 23 August 1305. So a physical impossibility!
William wallace was stretched then had his liver and other organs pulled out when he was alive then he had his head chopped off then he was drawn quartered then he had his put on a stick on the tower of london so everyone would what would happen to you if you didn't except king Edward 1's as the overlord or even king
Wallace's skill as a military leader is not apparent. This didn't however seem to stop men rallying to his banner, so it was likely that he was a very charasmatic and inspiring figure. As with many of history's figures, the legend is likely much bigger than the man!
Well i don't think so because i like looking back and it says no word that William Haig is related to Winston Churchill