Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
primary source
It is a secondary source.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
I believe that a encyclopedia is a secondary source, because the person who wrote it most likely didn't witness every single event in it. __--FROM GENIUS--__
An interview is a primary source of research, according to business.
Primary source because a primary source is from the past/something from someone whose been in that time but a secondary source is something from us/people who have not been in that time, and its also what we think happened then.
primary because a fossil is a thing you first see. if it was a book about fossils then its secondary.
If you know what a secondary source is, then you should know that everything is both a primary and a secondary source, but on what is always the question. So, if you are wondering if it is a primary source on the war crimes trials, then clearly it is not as Marrus was not there. But there may be primary source material used in the book.
Yes, a book is typically considered a secondary source as it interprets or analyzes information from primary sources. It provides context, commentary, and analysis of the primary sources but does not directly present original findings or data.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
A secondary source analyses and interprets a primary source. Some examples would be: a text book; the results for an experiment; or a website.
It is a primary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
it is a primary source
secondary
Secondary source
It is a secondary source.
There are two kinds of sources...primary and secondary. A primary source is information you see with your own eyes. An example would be a book written in first person, or a newspaper article. A secondary source is information that has been passed on. An example of this would be a gossip magazene or fiction book. Hope this helps :)