Primary - as it is a document produced at the time. It is not some later report.
It is a secondary source.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
An interview is a primary source of research, according to business.
I believe that a encyclopedia is a secondary source, because the person who wrote it most likely didn't witness every single event in it. __--FROM GENIUS--__
Primary source because a primary source is from the past/something from someone whose been in that time but a secondary source is something from us/people who have not been in that time, and its also what we think happened then.
primary because a fossil is a thing you first see. if it was a book about fossils then its secondary.
If you know what a secondary source is, then you should know that everything is both a primary and a secondary source, but on what is always the question. So, if you are wondering if it is a primary source on the war crimes trials, then clearly it is not as Marrus was not there. But there may be primary source material used in the book.
This is a secondary source.
Yes, a book is typically considered a secondary source as it interprets or analyzes information from primary sources. It provides context, commentary, and analysis of the primary sources but does not directly present original findings or data.
This is a primary source.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
A secondary source analyses and interprets a primary source. Some examples would be: a text book; the results for an experiment; or a website.
It is a primary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
A primary source provides firsthand information or data, while a secondary source interprets or analyzes primary sources.
it is a primary source
It is a secondary source.