Not necessarily. For example: I was walking down the street when I saw a man who needed help. Three clauses, no commas.
Yes, a comma is usually needed when a subordinate clause follows an independent clause to separate the two clauses.
Yes, a comma is generally needed when a subordinate clause begins with a subordinate conjunction. The comma is used to separate the subordinate clause from the main clause.
A responsible subordinate is someone who follows directions, meets deadlines, and takes ownership of their work. They communicate effectively, ask questions when needed, and seek feedback to improve their performance. They are reliable, trustworthy, and accountable for their actions.
The comma typically goes before "which" when introducing a nonrestrictive clause (provides additional information that is not essential to the meaning of the sentence). It is not needed before "which" when introducing a restrictive clause (essential information that is needed to understand the sentence).
You use a comma with because when you are using it as the beginning of a dependent clause or modifying clause. For exampleBecause Latoya was allergic to shrimp, Laquetta opted to make steak for the dinner party.orUncle Joe, because of his demetia, accidentally confused me with the grim reaper, subsequently opting to throw a bag of potato chips at my head.BECAUSE IS NOT A CONJUCTION...CONSEQUENTLY IT SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS ONE. THESE ARE THE TWO GENERALLY ACCEPTED USES FOR COMMAS AND BECAUSE.In fact, it's easier to just remember that you NEVER use a comma before the word "because". In the example above, the comma follows the dependent clause. It does not precede it and never should. "Because" ALWAYS introduces a dependent clause and should NEVER have a comma before it. Here's the rule: Independent clause + dependent clause = no comma.Dependent clause + independent clause = comma AFTER the dependent clause.
The comma goes before the word "and" when you are separating two independent clauses in a sentence. For example: "I finished my work, and then I went home."
Yes, a comma is generally needed when a subordinate clause begins with a subordinate conjunction. The comma is used to separate the subordinate clause from the main clause.
The simplest sentence consists of only a subject and a predicate (a noun and a verb) and is only one clause."Scott ran." is an example of such a sentence. It has one noun (Scott), one verb (ran), and is an independent clause (it stands alone as a sentence).A slightly more complex sentence can have two clauses as is evidenced by the following modification to the earlier example:"Scott ran, and he made it in time." The original sentence now contains two clauses (an independent one and a subordinate one).In general, though, "simple sentence" usually refers to a sentence with only one clause.
Leave some cookies and milk on Christmas Eve. Hopefully he will arrive.
The comma goes before the word "and" when you are separating two independent clauses in a sentence. For example: "I finished my work, and then I went home."
Noun clauses are used in writing to provide more information about a noun or pronoun in a sentence. They add complexity and detail to the sentence structure, allowing for clearer and more precise communication of ideas. Noun clauses can function as subjects, objects, or complements in a sentence, helping to convey the intended meaning effectively.
If it is used as what is termed an "interrupter," you use a comma. If it is joining two clauses, you use a semicolon before it and a comma after it. Interrupter: He would, therefore, appreciate a quick response. Joining clauses: He appreciates quick responses; therefore, I shall endeavour to provide them without delay.
The noun clause is 'what you needed to buy at the store', which is the direct object of the verb 'knew'.
wla
It is a living document because it can be changed when needed.
They needed a Government!
independent
yes