yes any contract is leagaly binding
A gratuitous promise, also known as a promise made without receiving anything in return, is generally not legally enforceable because it lacks consideration, a key element in forming a contract. However, there are certain exceptions where a gratuitous promise may be enforceable, such as if it is made under seal or if there is a clear intention to create legal relations.
Depends. If the favor is to give money to charity, common law said yes, and that's one of the few such enforceable promises to make a gift. Otherwise, generally no but facts can vary and if there's any kind of consideration for the promise, it might be enforceable.
The definition of a bilateral contract is a contract that involves mutual promises where each party is both a promise and promisor. It is a formal agreement where two parties promise something in exchange for the other person's promise.
No, a donation is, by definition, a gift. There is also the possibility of a "pledge", which is a promise of a future donation. Some pledges may be enforceable if they are obtained in exchange for a benefit. For example, "pledge tonight and get a copy of the video", would be an offer to enter into an enforceable contract.
A contract needs to show the exchange between parties. One person will do work in exchange for money, for example. If the contract merely said that one person will do work, but it makes no mention of what the other person must provide, the contract is probably not valid and not enforceable.
in a contract you are legally bound by it and a promise is something u just make someone. so if u break your contract you could go to jail but if u break a promise you might lose a friend or who ever you made that promise with.
If it is not written down an paper and signed it cannot be legally enforced by the court. If someone gives you their promise and then breaks it, while it may not be legally enforceable, it just means that you have been taught a valuable lesson about that person.
Consideration is an essential element of a legally binding contract where each party agrees to give or do something in exchange for something from the other party. In English law, consideration must be present for a contract to be enforceable, whereas in Indian law, a promise can be enforceable even without consideration under certain circumstances, such as promises made to close family members. Additionally, Indian law recognizes past consideration as valid consideration, while English law generally does not.
It is a promise to marry and in a way a contract; however the ring does not make the engamement legally binding.
A contract is binding when it is entered into between parties having the capacity to enter a contract, and is made in light of adequate consideration. Consideration can be defined as something of value which is a detriment to the one who gives it and a benefit to one who receives it. For example, if A promises to mow B's lawn, and B promises to pay A $50 when he finishes, the parties have exchanged consideration -- here, a promise for a promise.
A contract in which only one party makes an express promise, or undertakes a performance without first securing a reciprocal agreement from the other party. In a unilateral, or one-sided, contract, one party, known as the offeror, makes a promise in exchange for an act (or abstention from acting) by another party, known as the offeree. If the offeree acts on the offeror's promise, the offeror is legally obligated to fulfill the contract, but an offeree cannot be forced to act (or not act), because no return promise has been made to the offeror. After an offeree has performed, only one enforceable promise exists, that of the offeror. A unilateral contract differs from a Bilateral Contract, in which the parties exchange mutual promises. Bilateral contracts are commonly used in business transactions; a sale of goods is a type of bilateral contract. Reward offers are usually unilateral contracts. The offeror (the party offering the reward) cannot impel anyone to fulfill the reward offer. An offeree can sue for breach of contract, however, if the offeror does not provide the reward after the offeree has fulfilled the contract's requirements
In general: yes, it could be. If you want to know whether it could be in your specific case... talk to an attorney.