It was written after the events already took place.
The sourse of history are:- a) drawing b) picture c) events d) oral naration
yes
It was written in 1863 concerning slaves in the confederacy and it is of the time and not a secondary source.
Yes, a history textbook is a common secondary source because it is written by a scholar or researcher who has compiled information from various primary sources to create a comprehensive overview of a historical topic. The textbook provides analysis, interpretation, and context to help readers understand the subject matter.
a textbook is considered as a secondary source. for example, in many social studies textbook it stars or quotes a primary source, it is usually in italic letters.
A primary text is a text where the source was personal or direct. For example, a primary text would be an anecdote or autobiography. Quoting a speech directly, or describing an experience that the writer experienced THEMSELF would also be classified as a primary text. A secondary text ideally makes reference to a primary text. A history textbook may directly relay events in history (primary text), but a project based on the readings of this textbook would be a secondary text. Going even further, an essay based on the project, based on the textbook, based on actual events in history should be classified as perhaps a "tertiary" text. However, it is simply termed "secondary". A secondary text is any text that is not directly from the source.
no
Japanese Society for History Textbook Reform was created in 1996.
The sourse is in Canada
YES! The answer for the "In the Air" crossword is "SECONDARY" - this is NOT in the textbook!
Sandra M. Wagers has written: 'Non-western cultures in a U.S. world history textbook, with reference to preliminary UNESCO work on bias in textbooks' -- subject(s): Case studies, Civilization, Ethnocentrism, Study and teaching (Secondary), Textbook bias