Want this question answered?
You can obtain a generic Hold Harmless Agreement from many off the shelf Software suites offering legal forms at your local Computer software vendor.
in the sewer
A hold harmless agreement is a legal contract between two parties where one party agrees not to hold the other party liable for any damages, losses, or expenses that may arise from their participation in an activity or transaction. It is commonly used in situations where there is a risk of injury or damage, such as in sports events, construction projects, or business transactions.
It is a legal term which covers who pays for what in the event of litigation. In a construction contract setting, generally, the owner will require the contractor to indemnify, defend and hold them harmless in the event of a claim attributable to the work. Separately they mean: Indemnify - reimburse costs for defense of the claim Defend - control the defense of the claim Hold Harmless - agreement to not hold the owner liable for costs the contractor incurs as a result of defending the claim
Yes, they are completely harmless. They hold no threat for humans.
depends ..... are you an employee, a sub-contractor or engaged under some other scheme. also, have you signed a 'hold-harmless' agreement?
Also called an "indemnification", this type of agreement protects someone from being sued because of what a third person does to the victim. For example, before I let you clean the floors of my office, you will have to indemnify me (hold me harmless) if you negligently leave a dangerous condition that injures a visitor. The visitor sues me, I invoke indemnification, you pay all my legal bills and any damages awarded by the court.
It refers to your agreement that, if the insurer pays you a sum of money, and there comes along another person or entity that also asserts an entitlement to all or a part of that money, that you will indemnify and hold the insurer harmless from that claim. Indemnity is a legal theory that one will pay, on behalf of another, that which the other party may owe. To hold harmless means essentially the same thing but is often used to extend the obligation to the payment of attorney's fees and attending costs.
A type of hold harmless agreement usually between a property owner and the RR. If the owner wants a special sidetrack, the RR requires the owner to assume responsibility for certain losses for property damage or injury arising from the use of the track, even if the RR is at fault.
it depends on where you are holding it, if you try to hold it on my face, it's not harmless.
There is no substantial difference among the three terms.
If I understand the question correctly - the one who settled will appear in the "hiold blameless" category.