answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, a pamphlet written in 1952 could be considered a primary source for Prohibition if it contains information or perspectives from that time period. Primary sources are original materials that provide direct evidence of a historical event or topic.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is a pamphlet written in 1952 a primary source for Prohibition?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which document would be a primary source for the study of prohibition on?

A primary source is an unaltered document that was written by someone during the era in question. Journals or letters from bootleggers, bartenders or patrons would be primary sources for the study of Prohibition.


What does written primary source mean?

A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.


How might the use of an artifact as a primary source compare with the use of a written primary source?

The use of an artifact as a primary source is different than the use of a written primary source because when you exacavate for an artifact, you may have to make guesses. However, with a written primary source, you don't need to guess as the writing inside will have the answers to your questions or guesses.


A source that is written or created by a person who experienced an event personally is called a?

Primary Source - Apex Learning


Is the hornbook a primary or a secondary source?

It depends on what you need it for :)


Something written or created by a person who witnessed a historical event?

i think they are a primary source.... yes it is a primary source


Is the presidents inaugural address a primary source or secondary source?

It is a primary source because it came directly from him. An analysis of the speech written by a columnist would be a secondary source.


What is primary and secondary scources?

Primary Source: a firsthand account, also something written by someone who was there. Secondary source: a secondhand account also something written by someone who was not there.


What correctly defines defines primary source and scondary source?

Primary source: A historical document written by an eyewitness; secondary source: a historical document interpreting the accounts of eyewitnesses


Would a story about Persian wars still be a primary source if it were written by a historian?

No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.


To be considered a primary source a source must be?

written or created by a person who experienced an event


Would a book written this year about life on a Spanish mission in Florida be a primary source?

No, a book written this year about life on a Spanish mission in Florida would not be considered a primary source, as it is a modern interpretation or analysis of historical events. Primary sources are original documents or artifacts that provide firsthand evidence of a specific time period or event.