No, a primary source is a contemporary account. To write it now creates a secondary source.
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
Primary sources (in history) are things such as documents produced at the time. A secondary source is something written later by a historian. Good examples of primary source documents are legal notices, letters, diaries, newspapers, maps, flags, important documents, clothes, and even furniture.
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
Primary source
Primary source
A historian may ask themselves the following questions to determine if a primary source is usable: Is the source contemporary to the events being studied? Is the author credible and knowledgeable about the subject matter? Is there bias or perspective that needs to be considered when interpreting the source?
An historian wants to know how the gulf war was fought.what is the appropriate way to use primary source?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
A primary source is a source material that is closely related to the subject discribed with in.
A journal written by a black south African describing his experiences with apartheid polices -Apex