An historian wants to know how the Gulf War was fought.what is the appropriate way to use primary source?
Primary sources that are thoughtfully selected can help to bring history and cultures to life for students. Most basically, they are defined as the direct evidence of a time and place that you are studying - any material (documents, objects, etc.) that was produced by eyewitnesses to or participants in an event or historical moment under investigation. Primary sources are interesting to read for their own sake: they give us first hand, you-are-there insights into the past. They are also the most important tools an historian has for developing an understanding of an event. Primary sources serve as the evidence an historian uses in developing an interpretation and in building an argument to support that interpretation. You will be using primary sources not only to help you better understand what went on, but also as evidence as you answer questions and develop arguments about the past. Primary Sources do not speak for themselves, they have to be interpreted. That is, we can't always immediately understand what a primary source means, especially if it is from a culture significantly different from our own. It is therefore necessary to try to understand what it means and to figure out what the source can tell us about the past.
Primary sources and secondary sources
Primary sources.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
(Apex) Interview soldiers who served on both sides of the conflict.
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
A historian uses primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time under study, to gain a direct understanding of historical events. They also use secondary sources, such as books or articles written by other scholars, which interpret and analyze primary sources to provide context and a broader understanding of the historical period.
What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use
Yes , Arrian was able to use sources now lost to the modern historian .
I and IV
No. Use the internet to find primary sources.