No, because it didn't posses any of the characteristics of a living thing like- having cells, having internal environment, having the capacity to grow and develop, having the ability to reproduce, respond to stimuli, adaptation to the environment, etc.........
A printer is non-living. A printer is a machine that is made from plastic and metal parts.
It varies from living thing to living thing.
Sugar is not a living thing, but sugar does come from sugar canes which is a living thing :)
In biological terms, a clone is a living thing. For example, Dolly the sheep was a clone, and clearly she was a living thing.
It is a dormant living thing. Under the right conditions, it becomes an active living thing.
The safe distance between a photocopying machine and a personal workstation is at least one meter. The distance help in operating the photocopying machine.
1900
A computerised photocopying machine
1900
No, it is a machine.
By definition, a robot is a machine and therefore not a living entity.
A printer is non-living. A printer is a machine that is made from plastic and metal parts.
A printer is non-living. It is a machine made from plastic and metal parts.
Photocopying in 3D
The difference between you and the bicycle you ride on is that you are a living thing that breathes while the bicycle is a machine classified as a non living thing.
anantha and a rock a child and a toy, a teenager and a video game machine
A scanner operates most similarly to a photocopying machine. Both function to take copies of an original document.