A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in .
Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people.
As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
Secondary source
A picture can indeed be a primary source.
A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in . Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people. As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
If it was copied by someone else then given to you it's secondary because the whole point is that with secondary sources it may have been changed. A picture could be shopped if it's secondary source.
It depends what the picture is. If it's a picture of a painting in which the artist was there when whatever it was happened (example: a painting of the Battle of Yorktown in which the artist was there) it would be a primary source. If it was a picture where the person wasn't there (example: someone dressed up as George Washington) it would be a secondary source.
This is a secondary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
It is a secondary source.
secondary
an newspaper article will be an secondary source
Magazine articles are secondary sources
is pericles primary source or secondary source