its a primary source and second hand is a secondary source.
It really depends on if the painting was done in the time period in question. If the painting was done in the time period, it is a primary source. But, If you are using this for an essay, make sure to consult your teacher.
The secondary colours in art are blue, green and purple ok guys. Just remember the primary colours and you will get the secondary colours.
A tertiary color.
Fake
Secondary source
A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in . Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people. As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
A picture is not a secondary source it is a primary source only if it was drawn at the time or year it happened in . Lets say obama is elected president and i took a picture of him and send it to 10 people. As long as none of them messed with the picture this is still a primary source.
If a picture is copied directly from the original source, it is still considered a primary source. However, if the picture undergoes alteration or manipulation, it may no longer be considered a primary source.
It depends what the picture is. If it's a picture of a painting in which the artist was there when whatever it was happened (example: a painting of the Battle of Yorktown in which the artist was there) it would be a primary source. If it was a picture where the person wasn't there (example: someone dressed up as George Washington) it would be a secondary source.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
It is a primary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
it is a primary source
secondary
It is a secondary source.
Primary Source