It really depends on if the painting was done in the time period in question. If the painting was done in the time period, it is a primary source. But, If you are using this for an essay, make sure to consult your teacher.
A picture can indeed be a primary source.
its a primary source and second hand is a secondary source.
A painting is a secondary source. A painting may be done years after the event has happened.For example, the painting of Betsy Ross showing the American flag she made to George Washington is in many textbooks. The painting was made by an artist commissioned by a member of Betsy Ross' family. There is no proof that Betsy Ross actually made this flag.http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2002-01-13/news/0201130008_1_ross-sewed-betsy-ross-weisgerber
The secondary colours in art are blue, green and purple ok guys. Just remember the primary colours and you will get the secondary colours.
A tertiary color.
primary
Primary source because a primary source is from the past/something from someone whose been in that time but a secondary source is something from us/people who have not been in that time, and its also what we think happened then.
It depends what the picture is. If it's a picture of a painting in which the artist was there when whatever it was happened (example: a painting of the Battle of Yorktown in which the artist was there) it would be a primary source. If it was a picture where the person wasn't there (example: someone dressed up as George Washington) it would be a secondary source.
This is a secondary source.
This is a primary source.
is pericles primary source or secondary source
It is a primary source.
No, an encyclopedia is a secondary source.
A primary source provides firsthand information or data, while a secondary source interprets or analyzes primary sources.
it is a primary source
It is a secondary source.
Secondary source