A neutron star is the densest object known to us. (Apart from a black hole).
See related question.
Because the atoms inside the neutron star are squashed together to the point that they cannot move anymore, for example a teaspoon of neutron is about 90,000,000 tonnes. So basicly pretty much anything in the universe isn't as dense as that. hope this helps.
A dwarf star is denser than a giant star. Dwarf stars have a higher density due to their smaller size and higher mass compared to giant stars. Giant stars have larger volumes and lower densities as they have expanded and become less dense towards the end of their life cycle.
Yes, a Red Giant star is typically much larger than a neutron star. Red Giants are evolved massive stars that have expanded and cooled, while neutron stars are extremely dense remnants of supernova explosions that are only about 10-20 kilometers in diameter.
They are much denser. it's the same with stars and neutron stars. Neutron stars are many times smaller than the original star but much heavier because they are so denser
No, the density of a neutron star is much higher than that of a white dwarf. Neutron stars are composed mostly of densely packed neutrons, while white dwarfs are made of electron-degenerate matter. Neutron stars are some of the densest objects in the universe.
Yes, a neutron star is much more massive and denser than a planet. Neutron stars are formed from the remnants of massive stars and are typically only a few kilometers in diameter, while planets can be thousands of kilometers in size.
A subgiant star is larger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact remnants of massive stars, while subgiant stars are in a transitional phase between main sequence and red giant stages, typically larger and more diffuse than neutron stars.
Nothing known is denser than the densest of neutron stars except a gravitational singularity (Black hole). The upper limit of the inward pressure a neutron star can handle before further implosion is dictated by neutron degeneracy pressure. However, theoretically (Not yet observed but probably out there) the next step would be a quark star, that is, a star that is held from implosion by quark degeneracy pressure. Then the next stage would be a black hole. Technically there is yet another stage in between a qaurk star and a singularity called preon degeneracy prssure but the preon models are too flawed to even consider.
It can either become a neutron star or a black hole. If the star is between 8 and 15 solar masses, it will become an incredibly dense neutron star. If it is more than 15 solar masses, it will collapse and become an even denser black hole.
Yes, a nebula is far larger than a neutron star. A neutron star is a few miles across. A nebula is light years across.
Yes, the Earth is much denser than our sun.
No, a neutron star can't become a nebula. A neutron star is not made of atomic matter, has less mass than a nebula, and has no mechanism by which to expand.