Yes far bigger.
A red giant would cover the distance from the Sun to the Earth.
A neutron star could be the size of New York City.
A subgiant star is larger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact remnants of massive stars, while subgiant stars are in a transitional phase between main sequence and red giant stages, typically larger and more diffuse than neutron stars.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
Yes, a solar nebula is much larger than a neutron star. In terms of objects in space, neutron stars are tiny; only a few miles across. A stellar nebula such as the one that formed the sun is light years across.
A subgiant star is bigger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact, with a radius of about 10-15 kilometers, while subgiant stars have a larger radius of several million kilometers.
A giant star is always larger and more massive than our sun. It is in a later stage of its life cycle where it has exhausted its core hydrogen fuel and has expanded.
A subgiant star is larger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact remnants of massive stars, while subgiant stars are in a transitional phase between main sequence and red giant stages, typically larger and more diffuse than neutron stars.
Yes, a nebula is far larger than a neutron star. A neutron star is a few miles across. A nebula is light years across.
A white dwarf is much larger than a neutron star.
A neutron star is the densest object known to us. (Apart from a black hole). See related question.
any giant or supergiant
A supergiant simply is a large giant - so, it is larger (in diameter) than a "regular" giant star.
Yes, a solar nebula is much larger than a neutron star. In terms of objects in space, neutron stars are tiny; only a few miles across. A stellar nebula such as the one that formed the sun is light years across.
Yes, UY Scuti is a red supergiant star, which is a type of star that is larger and brighter than a red giant star.
A subgiant star is bigger than a neutron star. Neutron stars are incredibly dense and compact, with a radius of about 10-15 kilometers, while subgiant stars have a larger radius of several million kilometers.
No. The sun is the nearest star to Earth. The next closes star is more than 250,000 times farther away. The sun is larger than the average star, but not a giant.
A black hole has more mass than a neutron star, but if you are comparing volume it would depend on the mass of the black hole. A neutron star is estimated to be about 14 miles in diameter, which is larger than the event horizon of a black hole up to about 3.8 times the mass of the sun. A more massive black hole will be larger.
Because the atoms inside the neutron star are squashed together to the point that they cannot move anymore, for example a teaspoon of neutron is about 90,000,000 tonnes. So basicly pretty much anything in the universe isn't as dense as that. hope this helps.