0
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way todemonstrate dead the hypothesis is wrong?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong?
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
Is a hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
Yes Because.!!(:
Is a scientific hypotheses accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
the statement that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by a force is an example of using of the following?
How does the scientific method work if your hypothesis is wrong?
You make a new hypothesis and then start over from the research.
Is a scientific hypothesis a accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that it is wrong?
It is accepted if the data support it.
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong?
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
Is a hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
Yes Because.!!(:
Is the best definition of a scientific theory?
A scientific theory is an extensively tested hypothesis that is accepted as the best answer we can come up with, since nobody has been able to prove it wrong yet.
What is the scientific theory definition?
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and validation. It is a framework that helps us understand and predict natural phenomena. Scientific theories are supported by empirical data and are subject to revision in light of new evidence.
Is a scientific hypotheses accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
the statement that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by a force is an example of using of the following?
How does the scientific method work if your hypothesis is wrong?
You make a new hypothesis and then start over from the research.
Is the following sentence true or falseBefore a hypothesis can become an accepted part of scientific knowledgeit must be tested and analyised.?
Although the spelling may be wrong in places, the sentence is true.
What does it mean to say that if a hypothesis is scientific then there must be means of proving that it was wrong?
kkk
