There are many scientific laws. They are scientific principles that have been tested by many scientists, and not been disproved. It takes a lot of scientific evidence to support a theory before it becomes law. A scientific law is a theory or hypothesis that has been tested various times through experimentation and has had data collected and observed.
Not exactly.
A scientific law is actually something that has been proven.
& To this day, it can still be proven.
A well established hypothesis is simply something you think.
Sure, you can test a hypothesis, over and over again, if you'd like....
But, the truth of the matter is that a hypothesis might NEVER be proven wrong.
Stick to the laws... they're the truth.
A scientific law or scientific principle is a concise verbal or mathematical statement of a relation that expresses a fundamental principle of science, like Newton's law of universal gravitation. A scientific law must always apply under the same conditions, and implies a causal relationship between its elements. The law must be confirmed and broadly agreed upon through the process of Inductive Reasoning. As well, factual and well-confirmed statements like "Mercury is liquid at standard temperature and pressure" are considered to be too specific to qualify as scientific laws. A central problem in the philosophy of Science, going back to David Hume, is that of distinguishing scientific laws from principles that arise merely accidentally because of the constant conjunction of one thing and another.
A law differs from a scientific theory in that it does not posit a mechanism or explanation of phenomena: it is merely a distillation of the results of repeated observation. As such, a law is limited in applicability to circumstances resembling those already observed, and is often found to be false when extrapolated. Ohm's law only applies to constant currents, Newton's law of universal gravitation only applies in weak gravitational fields, the early laws of aerodynamics such as Bernoulli's Gravitation do not apply in case of compressible flow such as occurs in transonic and supersonic flight, Hooke's law only applies to strainbelow the elastic limit, etc.
The term "scientific law" is traditionally associated with the natural sciences, though the Social Sciences also contain scientific laws.[2] Laws can become obsolete if they are found in contradiction with new data, as with Bode's law or thebiogenetic law.
A scientific law is something that can be proven, where as a hypothesis is a educated guess that can be proven or dis proven.
you
Yes.
Experimentation is an operation or procedure carried out under controlled conditions in order to discover an unknown effect or law, to test or establish a hypothesis, or to illustrate a known law.
Statement that summarizes a pattern found in Nature is called "Scientific law". It is a description of an observed phenomenon in nature.
False, a statement that can be tested is a hypothesis. In a hypothesis "if...then..." format, one is presenting a possible solution to a question. A law is a proven statement or idea.
law
A theory is a proposed idea as an explaination to a problem. A scientific law is a tested and experimentally proven idea that can be considered as truth; until experimentally disproven. Newton's law of gravity was law, proven by experimental observations, right up until Einstein developed special relativity and it was experimentally proven. Thus disproving Newton's "law". String theory is an idea that is quite appealing to physicists, but there is no experimental proof to its validity, so it remains as just a theory.
A hypothesis is a guess when a scientific law has been answered and proven.
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
Scientific law :)
scientific fact or scientific law
A hypothesis is any concept concerning understanding something, anything. A (scientific) theory is a hypothesis which has been tested and found (so far) to be true. A "scientific law" is just a thumb-nail description of a theory (its never complete).
false is a hypothesis
A scientific law is one that has been tested throughout hypothesis and theory and proven to be true all the time.
A well tested idea that explains and connects a wide range of observations is a scientific theory. This is sometimes confused with a scientific law.
Conservation of energy is well beyond the status of hypothesis. It is a theory so well supported by experiment that it is considered to be one of the fundamental laws of physics. I'm not sure why this is being asked in the Legal Issues category.
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
The correct steps for the scientific method are: Observation Hypothesis Theory Scientific Law
When scientists develop a scientific law or theory they follow the scientific method. They first develop a hypothesis and then test their hypotheses in order to record any reactions or occurrences. Once they have performed enough tests to either prove or disprove their hypothesis they can state a scientific law or theory.