No. Marsupials are a division of mammals. A shark is not a mammal at all. It is a cartilagenous fish.
No, a tiger shark is not a marsupial.
The answer is a marsupial for sure.
its a fish
Neither. A shark is a cartilaginous fish. Furthermore. A marsupials are mammals and none of them are oviparous.
marsupial (I have a 100% correct on this one because i have the same analogy as this and I got the answer right)
No, an alpaca is not a marsupial.
No. The star-nosed marsupial is not a marsupial, but a placental mammal. The only marsupial moles are found in northern Australia.
There is no such animal as the "southern marsupial". However, if there was such an animal, it would mist likely be a marsupial. The vast majority of marsupial species are nocturnal.
NO. a marsupial carries it young in a pouch.
A marsupial has a skin covering of fur.
An ibex is not a marsupial. It is a placental mammal.
A wallaroo is a marsupial.