Neither. A shark is a cartilaginous fish. Furthermore. A marsupials are mammals and none of them are oviparous.
No. Marsupials are a division of mammals. A shark is not a mammal at all. It is a cartilagenous fish.
The Tasmanian Devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is a carnivorous marsupial mammal that is native to Tasmania. They do not lay eggs.
marsupial (I have a 100% correct on this one because i have the same analogy as this and I got the answer right)
No, a tiger shark is not a marsupial.
A marsupial is a mammal.A deer is not a marsupial, which is a sub-group of the mammal classification. A deer is known as a placental mammal, or Eutherian.
An oviparous shark is a shark species that lays eggs rather than giving birth to live young. The female shark will deposit fertilized eggs in suitable locations to develop and hatch outside of her body. Examples of oviparous sharks include some species of catsharks and horn sharks.
An elephant is a mammal, not a marsupial.
An ibex is not a marsupial. It is a placental mammal.
A wallaroo is a marsupial.
A mammal which is not a marsupial or a monotreme is called a placental mammal. There is no opposite to a marsupial. An animal is either a marsupial or it is not. Marsupial is the term given to any mammal of the order Marsupialia whose young are born in an immature state and continue development in the "marsupium" (or pouch).
A kangaroo is a marsupial mammal.
Yes, a wombat is a mammal and a marsupial.