Want this question answered?
There is evidence that the Nebular hypothesis was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg.Immanuel Kant, who was familiar with Swedenborg's work, developed the theory further in 1755. A similar model was proposed in 1796 by Pierre-Simon Laplace.
The correct spelling is hypothesis instead of hypothesis. A hypothesis is an educated guess on how you think something will work. It is a tentative statement, proposed explanation, or statement of prediction.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation - therefore not an answer
Evolution as an idea has existed since ancient times. The first thinkers to propose that modern lifeforms evolved from earlier forms were Greek philosophers, like Anaximander and Empedocles, living centuries BCE. Naturally, they thought that the way life and the world presented themselves to them was evidence for their hypotheses. It wasn't until Charles Darwin that a comprehensive explanation for evolution was proposed, one that consisted of falsifiable hypotheses and that was supported by independently verifiable evidence to such an extent that it defeated alternative explanations in scope and accuracy. For more information, see links below.
A logical hypothesis is a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.
proposed modes for treatment
A proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation
it was proposed by edward Édouard Roche it's not so real .... no supporting evidence is there for this hypothesis
Basically I think it would be easiest to look at it from this perspective. There are theories and facts. Facts are truths that can be proven through experience or observation and evaluation. And theories basically are created because a phenomenon exists without an explanation and any verifiable, concrete evidence or proof, or explanation. So some strive to compile a rational strand of proposed occurences in order to try to understand how this phenomenon can exist! It is a deconstruction of something without any facts in an attempt to find a logical explanation for its existence or occurance; but if verifiable evidence or proof cannot be found to support their theory- it cannot be proven to become fact... so it remains just a theory .
Fossils.
There is evidence that the Nebular hypothesis was first proposed in 1734 by Emanuel Swedenborg.Immanuel Kant, who was familiar with Swedenborg's work, developed the theory further in 1755. A similar model was proposed in 1796 by Pierre-Simon Laplace.
I think the word you're looking for is hypothesis, which is in your question. But you could mean estimate as in an amount of something. Or prediction could be it. But I'm sure the word you want is hypothesis.
There is no verifiable evidence or scientific basis to support Eric Dege's method for being invisible. Invisibility is not a scientifically proven phenomenon, and claims of achieving it through methods like the one proposed by Eric Dege are usually based on pseudoscience or fiction.
The correct spelling is hypothesis instead of hypothesis. A hypothesis is an educated guess on how you think something will work. It is a tentative statement, proposed explanation, or statement of prediction.
the study does not require informed consent or survey instruments
god is angry
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation - therefore not an answer