Yes, During an ultra sound they measure the length of the baby, the limbs if visible, head circumference etc.. then calculate an expected delivery date. An ultrasound is accurate to within a couple of days if done at 8 weeks. At 20 weeks it is accurate to within a week. After this babies grow at such diffeerent rates that it becomes increasingly less accurate.
Relative dating is not more accurate than absolute dating. Relative dating will, if done properly, give you an order sequence in time but it will not return any information about when something happened unless there is other information that can be used to establish a time frame.
Which of these dating methods is capable of giving the most accurate age of an artifact?
Does not always reflect the true sequence of events in time
Half-life
12% 10,000 years
The ultrasound dating has excellent and precise estimation of gestation especially if done in the first trimester (first 12 weeks). After 12 weeks, its accuracy goes down. However, compared to dating according to menstrual cycle, the ultrasound would be more accurate.
If the ultrasound is done in the first weeks of pregnancy it is possible to date the embryo within a few days, an ultra sound done later is not as accurate for dating purposes.
My wife told her doctor she didn't know when her last mp was, so he sent her for an ultrasound! She lied, we just wanted 2 get an early ultrasound, and it was exact 2 the day and that was at 5 weeks 4 days! Our 1st baby measured within 5 days thru the entire pregnancy, and that was as early as 8 weeks and as late as 26!
Yes. You should tell your Dr so that they can preform an ultrasound to provide you with more accurate dating.
Biparietal diameter (BPD) is the diameter across the developing baby's skull, from one parietal bone to the other. The measurement is useful in dating the pregnancy and estimating fetal weight after about 13 weeks of pregnancy.
I think this is what you mean. For example. On 28th December the ultrasound said you were 8 weeks pregnant, then on 25th January it said you were 12 weeks pregnant. This would be accurate to within 4-5 days each time.
It remains a useful technique especially in materials lacking radioactive isotopes. Relative dating by biostratigraphy is the preferred method inpaleontology, and is in some respects more accurate
No, it is a method of dating materials that is very accurate.
Carbon dating and radioactive dating are more effective, assuming those arn't the same thing. =]
Pregnant in Heels - 2011 The Pregnancy Dating Dilemma 2-8 was released on:USA: 3 July 2012Pregnant in Heels - 2011 The Pregnancy Dating Dilemma - 2.8 was released on:USA: 3 July 2012
Carbon dating
Relative dating is not more accurate than absolute dating. Relative dating will, if done properly, give you an order sequence in time but it will not return any information about when something happened unless there is other information that can be used to establish a time frame.