yes
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
it is an educated guess that can be tested by experiment
A conclusion is what the experimenter observes from the experiment andwhether your hypothesis was proven correct or not.While the theory is the facts that is known about the experiment
Quantum theory was not the result of a single experiment, a single discovery, or even a single scientist. Quantum theory evolved gradually, over several decades.
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
They draw inferrences or conculution whether the theory is true or false. They validate or disapprove the hypothesis.
They draw inferrences or conculution whether the theory is true or false. They validate or disapprove the hypothesis.
A theory is useless if it cannot be tested and verified/disproven. That is the purpose of experiments.
There is no room for the spiritual aspect of things. Science is just cold hard facts, and theories. The greatest scientist was God the intelligent being. That is my theory.
experiment, in the scientific method the hypothesis is tested through experimentation and if confirmed is called a theory :D
experiment, in the scientific method the hypothesis is tested through experimentation and if confirmed is called a theory :D